Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32198654›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2020

Listening to the neurological teams for multiple sclerosis: the SMART project.

P Chesi, M G Marini, G L Mancardi, F Patti, SMART study project group, L Alivernini, A Bisecco, G Borriello, S Bucello, F Caleri and 26 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors.

P ChesiHealth Care and Wellbeing Area, Fondazione ISTUD, Milan, Italy. PChesi@istud.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7664-9258
M G MariniHealth Care and Wellbeing Area, Fondazione ISTUD, Milan, Italy.
G L MancardiDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova and Scientific Clinical Institutes Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia-Genova Nervi, Genova, Italy.
F PattiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Science, and Advanced Technologies, G.F. Ingrassia, Multiple Sclerosis Center, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
SMART study project group
L Alivernini
A Bisecco
G Borriello
S Bucello
F Caleri
P Cavalla
E Cocco
C Cordioli
M Di Giuseppe
R Fantozzi
M Gattuso
F Granella
M Liguori
L Locatelli
A Lugaresi
S Marangoni
L Moiola
E Mutta
W Neri
L Pastò
P Perini
M Petruzzo
K Plewnia
A M Repice
M Rezzonico
S Romano
M Rovaris
E Sessa
C Tortorella
R Totaro
P Valentino

Funding

Biogen Italia Srl /
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAim of the research was to define the quality of life of Italian neurologists and nurses' professional caring for multiple sclerosis, to understand their living the clinical practice and identify possible signals of compassion fatigue. MATERIAL AND

methodsOne hundred five neurologists and nurses from 30 Italian multiple sclerosis centres were involved in an online quali-quantitative survey on the organization of care, combined with the Satisfaction and Compassion Fatigue Test and a collection of narratives. Descriptive statistics of the quantitative data were integrated with the results obtained by the narrative medicine methods of analysis.

resultsMost of the practitioners were neurologists, 46 average years old, 69% women, 43% part time dedicated to multiple sclerosis. An increased number of patients in the last 3 years were referred in 29 centres. Differences were found between neurologists and nurses. Physicians showed higher risks of burnout, reporting intensive working paces, lack of medical personnel, and anxiety caused by the precarious employment conditions. Nurses appeared more satisfied, although the reference to the lack of spaces, and the cross professional roles risk of compassion fatigue. Both positive and negative relationships of care were depicted as influencing the professional quality of life.

conclusionThe interviewed neurological teams need to limit the risk of compassion fatigue, which appeared from the first years of the career. The prevalence of the risk among neurologists suggests more awareness among scientific societies and health care managers on the risk for this category, as first step to prevent it.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisQuality of LifeCross-Sectional StudiesEmpathyFemaleHumansItalyJob SatisfactionMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesBurnoutCompassion fatigueNarrative medicine

Identifiers

PMID32198654
PMCPMC7224035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.