Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32198607›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2020

Glaucoma as the presenting sign of intraocular tumors: beware of the masquerading sign.

Vijitha S Vempuluru, Saumya Jakati, Rashmi Krishnamurthy, Sirisha Senthil, Swathi Kaliki

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Personalized treatment approaches in intraocular cancer.Advances in ophthalmology practice and research
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vijitha S VempuluruOphthalmic Plastic Surgery and Ocular Oncology Services, The Operation Eyesight Universal Institute for Eye Cancer, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, 500034, India.
Saumya JakatiOphthalmic Pathology Laboratory, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Rashmi KrishnamurthyVST Centre for Glaucoma Care, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Sirisha SenthilVST Centre for Glaucoma Care, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Swathi KalikiOphthalmic Plastic Surgery and Ocular Oncology Services, The Operation Eyesight Universal Institute for Eye Cancer, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, 500034, India. kalikiswathi@yahoo.com.
L V Prasad Eye Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo discuss the clinical presentation and management of intraocular tumors masquerading as primary glaucoma or non-tumor-related secondary glaucoma.

methodsRetrospective chart review.

resultsTen patients with unsuspected intraocular tumor were referred to glaucoma clinic with a diagnosis of primary glaucoma or non-tumor-related secondary glaucoma. The mean age at referral was 25 years (median, 22 years; range, 1 day to 58 years). Referral diagnosis included neovascular glaucoma (n = 6), congenital glaucoma (n = 3), and angle-closure glaucoma (n = 1). The significant clinical signs included corneal edema (n = 3), megalocornea (n = 3), iris neovascularization (n = 4), hyphema (n = 2), and pseudohypopyon (n = 2). The mean interval between the onset of symptoms and the establishment of accurate diagnosis was 4 months (median, 3 months; range, 0.5-13 months). Two patients underwent inadvertent trabeculectomy, and one patient underwent evisceration prior to definitive diagnosis. The final diagnosis included uveal melanocytoma (n = 2), ciliary body medulloepithelioma (n = 2), choroidal melanoma (n = 2), retinoblastoma (n = 1), retinal capillary hemangioblastoma (n = 1), choroidal schwannoma (n = 1), and uveal metastasis (n = 1). The treatment modalities included plaque radiotherapy (n = 1), enucleation (n = 6), palliative systemic chemotherapy (n = 1), a combination of enucleation, systemic chemotherapy, and external beam radiotherapy (n = 1), and one patient was lost to follow-up. There was no evidence of death over a mean follow-up period of 13 months (median, 5 months; range, 2 weeks to 7 years).

conclusionUnilateral raised intraocular pressure, iris neovascularization, or both may be the presenting features of intraocular tumors. High degree of suspicion and a thorough examination reveals the definitive diagnosis.

Indexed as

GlaucomaRetinal NeoplasmsUveal NeoplasmsCiliary BodyHumansIntraocular PressureRetrospective StudiesEyeGlaucomaIntraocular tumorNeovascular glaucomaSecondary glaucomaTumor

Identifiers

PMID32198607
OpenAlexW3011546857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.