Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32198571›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2020

Current Concepts in the Management of Vertebral Compression Fractures.

Dylan Hoyt, Ivan Urits, Vwaire Orhurhu, Mariam Salisu Orhurhu, Jessica Callan, Jordan Powell, Laxmaiah Manchikanti, Alan D Kaye, Rachel J Kaye, Omar Viswanath

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
15.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Role of SEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Dylan HoytCreighton University School of Medicine-Phoenix Regional Campus, Phoenix, AZ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9727-294X
Ivan UritsDepartment of Anesthesia, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA, 02215, USA. iurits@bidmc.harvard.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3652-6085
Vwaire OrhurhuDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2794-738X
Mariam Salisu OrhurhuDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Jessica CallanUniversity of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Jordan PowellUniversity of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1657-0860
Laxmaiah ManchikantiPain Management Centers of America, Paducah, KY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4201-9063
Alan D KayeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Rachel J KayeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2464-0187
Omar ViswanathValley Anesthesiology and Pain Consultants, Phoenix, AZ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6124-7037
Creighton University · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of Arizona · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USPain Management Centers Of America · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis comprehensive review of current concepts in the management of vertebral compression fractures is a manuscript of vertebral augmentation literature of risk factors, clinical presentation, and management. The objective of this review is to compare outcomes between multiple augmentation techniques and ongoing discussions of effectiveness of vertebral augmentation procedures. RECENT

findingsVertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are a prevalent disease affecting approximately 1.5 million US adults annually. VCFs can cause severe physical limitations, including back pain, functional disability, and progressive kyphosis of the thoracic spine that ultimately results in decreased appetite, poor nutrition, impaired pulmonary function, and spinal cord compression with motor and sensory deficits. The deconditioning that affects patients with vertebral compression fractures leads to mortality at a far higher rate than age-matched controls. The management of vertebral compression fractures has been extensively discussed with opponents arguing in favor or restricting conservative management and against augmentation, while proponents argue in favor of augmentation. The literature is well established in reference to the effects on mortality when patients undergo treatment with vertebral augmentation; in over a million patients with vertebral compression fractures treated with vertebral augmentation as compared with patients treated with non-surgical management, the patients receiving augmentation performed well with a decrease in morbidity and mortality. Summary of the literature review shows that understanding the risk factors, appropriate clinical evaluation, and management strategies are crucial. Analysis of the evidence shows, based on level I and II studies, balloon kyphoplasty had significantly better and vertebroplasty tended to have better pain reduction compared with non-surgical management. In addition, balloon kyphoplasty tended to have better height restoration than vertebroplasty.

Indexed as

Fractures, CompressionHumansSpinal FracturesTreatment OutcomeVertebroplastyKyphoplastyOsteoporosisOsteoporotic compression fractureVertebral augmentationVertebroplasty

Identifiers

PMID32198571
OpenAlexW3012831093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.