ReviewWiener klinische Wochenschrift2020
A critical examination of the main premises of Traditional Chinese Medicine.
Review in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Public perceptions and engagement with Traditional Chinese Medicine on Japanese social media (2010-2025): a text mining approach.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Emergency Protective Measures and Strategies of COVID-19: From Lifestyle to Traditional Chinese Medicine.Clinical complementary medicine and pharmacology · 2023Review
- Quantitative Bioactivity Signatures of Dietary Supplements and Natural Products.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2023Article
- Article
- Feral pharmaceuticalization-Biomedical uses of animal life in light of the global donkey hide trade.BioSocieties · 2023Article
- Herbal and dietary supplement induced liver injury: Highlights from the recent literature.World journal of hepatology · 2021Review
- Evaluating traditional Chinese medicine diagnostic instruments for functional dyspepsia: systematic review on measurement properties.Integrative medicine research · 2021Review
- Pien Tze Huang (PZH) as a Multifunction Medicinal Agent in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM): a review on cellular, molecular and physiological mechanisms.Cancer cell international · 2021Review
- The Universality of Science and Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Philosophical Survey.Science & education · 2021Article
- The Revaluation of Plant-Derived Terpenes to Fight Antibiotic-Resistant Infections.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) consists of a plethora of therapeutic approaches aiming to both characterize and treat diseases. Its utilization has gained significant popularity in the western world and is even backed by the World Health Organization's decision to include TCM diagnostic patterns into the new revision of the International Classification of Diseases code, the global standard for diagnostic health information. As these developments and potentially far-reaching decisions can affect modern healthcare systems and daily clinical work as well as wildlife conservation, its underlying factual basis must be critically examined. This article therefore provides an overview of the evidence underlying the basic TCM concepts, such as Qi, meridians, acupuncture, pulse and tongue diagnostics as well as traditional herbal treatments. Moreover, it discusses whether scientific literature on TCM reflects the current standard for evidence-based research, as described in good scientific practice and good clinical practice guidelines. Importantly, misinformation regarding the therapeutic efficacy of animal-derived substances has lead and currently leads to problems with wildlife preservation and animal ethics. Nevertheless, the (re-)discovery of artemisinin more than 50 years ago introduced a novel development in TCM: the commingling of Eastern and Western medicine, the appreciation of both systems. The need for more rigorous approaches, fulfilment of and agreement to current guidelines to achieve high-quality research are of utmost relevance. Thereby, ancient knowledge of herbal species and concoctions may serve as a possible treasure box rather than Pandora's box.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.