Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32198542›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2020

Modulation of ellipses drawing by sonification.

Eric O Boyer, Frederic Bevilacqua, Emmanuel Guigon, Sylvain Hanneton, Agnes Roby-Brami

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eric O BoyerISIR, CNRS UMR 7222, INSERM ERL 1050, Institute of Intelligent Systems and Robotics, Sorbonne University, 4 place Jussieu, 75005, Paris, France.
Frederic BevilacquaIRCAM, CNRS UMR 9912, Team STMS, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Emmanuel GuigonISIR, CNRS UMR 7222, INSERM ERL 1050, Institute of Intelligent Systems and Robotics, Sorbonne University, 4 place Jussieu, 75005, Paris, France.
Sylvain HannetonInstitut Des Sciences du Sport-Santé EA3625, University Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
Agnes Roby-BramiISIR, CNRS UMR 7222, INSERM ERL 1050, Institute of Intelligent Systems and Robotics, Sorbonne University, 4 place Jussieu, 75005, Paris, France. roby-brami@isir.upmc.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6196-7229
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

Labex SMART ANR-11-IDEX-0004-02.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most studies on the regulation of speed and trajectory during ellipse drawing have used visual feedback. We used online auditory feedback (sonification) to induce implicit movement changes independently from vision. The sound was produced by filtering a pink noise with a band-pass filter proportional to movement speed. The first experiment was performed in 2D. Healthy participants were asked to repetitively draw ellipses during 45 s trials whilst maintaining a constant sonification pattern (involving pitch variations during the cycle). Perturbations were produced by modifying the slope of the mapping without informing the participants. All participants adapted spontaneously their speed: they went faster if the slope decreased and slower if it increased. Higher velocities were achieved by increasing both the frequency of the movements and the perimeter of the ellipses, but slower velocities were achieved mainly by decreasing the perimeter of the ellipses. The shape and the orientation of the ellipses were not significantly altered. The analysis of the speed-curvature power law parameters showed consistent modulations of the speed gain factor, while the exponent remained stable. The second experiment was performed in 3D and showed similar results, except that the main orientation of the ellipse also varied with the changes in speed. In conclusion, this study demonstrated implicit modulation of movement speed by sonification and robust stability of the ellipse geometry. Participants appeared to limit the decrease in movement frequency during slowing down to maintain a rhythmic and not discrete motor regimen.

Indexed as

AdultAuditory PerceptionFeedback, SensoryFemaleHumansMaleMotor ActivityPitch PerceptionPsychomotor PerformanceTime PerceptionYoung AdultAudio feedbackKinematicsSpeed controlSpeed–curvature

Identifiers

PMID32198542
OpenAlexW3012133597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.