Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32198159›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Shunting Inhibition Improves Synchronization in Heterogeneous Inhibitory Interneuronal Networks with Type 1 Excitability Whereas Hyperpolarizing Inhibition Is Better for Type 2 Excitability.

Ruben A Tikidji-Hamburyan, Carmen C Canavier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Connectivity concepts in neuronal network modeling.PLoS computational biology · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ruben A Tikidji-HamburyanDepartment of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70112.ORCID 0000-0002-0309-2129
Carmen C CanavierDepartment of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70112 ccanav@lsuhsc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4368-6906
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · US

Funding

Synchronization in Noisy, Heterogeneous Excitatory/Inhibitory NetworksR01NS054281 · NINDS · LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER · PI CANAVIER, CARMEN CASTRO · 2005 to 2022
$5.4M
CRCNS: Cholinergic contribution to hippocampal information processingR01MH115832 · NIMH · LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER · PI CANAVIER, CARMEN CASTRO, GASPARINI, SONIA · 2017 to 2021
$1.8M
CRCNS: Phase resetting predicts synchronization in hybrid hippocampal circuitsR01MH085387 · NIMH · LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER · PI CANAVIER, CARMEN CASTRO · 2008 to 2010
$944k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085387NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115832NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS054281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All-to-all homogeneous networks of inhibitory neurons synchronize completely under the right conditions; however, many modeling studies have shown that biological levels of heterogeneity disrupt synchrony. Our fundamental scientific question is "how can neurons maintain partial synchrony in the presence of heterogeneity and noise?" A particular subset of strongly interconnected interneurons, the PV+ fast-spiking (FS) basket neurons, are strongly implicated in γ oscillations and in phase locking of nested γ oscillations to theta. Their excitability type apparently varies between brain regions: in CA1 and the dentate gyrus they have type 1 excitability, meaning that they can fire arbitrarily slowly, whereas in the striatum and cortex they have type 2 excitability, meaning that there is a frequency thresh old below which they cannot sustain repetitive firing. We constrained the models to study the effect of excitability type (more precisely bifurcation type) in isolation from all other factors. We use sparsely connected, heterogeneous, noisy networks with synaptic delays to show that synchronization properties, namely the resistance to suppression and the strength of theta phase to γ amplitude coupling, are strongly dependent on the pairing of excitability type with the type of inhibition. Shunting inhibition performs better for type 1 and hyperpolarizing inhibition for type 2. γ Oscillations and their nesting within theta oscillations are thought to subserve cognitive functions like memory encoding and recall; therefore, it is important to understand the contribution of intrinsic properties to these rhythms.

Indexed as

InterneuronsAction Potentialsoscillationsphase amplitude couplingphase lockingsynchrony

Identifiers

PMID32198159
PMCPMC7210489
OpenAlexW3011409319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.