Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32198149›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2020

Identification of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Sensitive to Systemic Cancer Therapies Using Radiomics.

Laurent Dercle, Matthew Fronheiser, Lin Lu, Shuyan Du, Wendy Hayes, David K Leung, Amit Roy, Julia Wilkerson, Pingzhen Guo, Antonio T Fojo and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 175 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine.Thoracic research and practice · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The Right to Explanation in AI: In a Lonely Place.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Laurent DercleDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York. laurent.dercle@gmail.com.
Matthew FronheiserTranslational Medicine, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey.
Lin LuDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.
Shuyan DuTranslational Medicine, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey.
Wendy HayesTranslational Medicine, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey.
David K LeungTranslational Medicine, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey.
Amit RoyClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey.
Julia WilkersonThe National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Pingzhen GuoDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.
Antonio T FojoColumbia University/New York Presbyterian Hospital and James J. Peters VA Medical Center, New York, New York.
Lawrence H SchwartzDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.
Binsheng ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USBristol-Myers Squibb (Sweden) · SEBristol-Myers Squibb (Germany) · DENational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Vaccine Response and Immunotherapeutics SWGP30AI094189 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Richard E. Chaisson · 2012 to 2026
$67.0M
Integrating Radiomics into S0819 and Lung-MAP, Biomarker Driven Clinical Trials for Lung CancerU01CA225431 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI SCHWARTZ, LAWRENCE H, ZHAO, BINSHENG · 2018 to 2022
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA225431NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI094189
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUsing standard-of-care CT images obtained from patients with a diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we defined radiomics signatures predicting the sensitivity of tumors to nivolumab, docetaxel, and gefitinib. EXPERIMENTAL

designData were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively across multicenter clinical trials [nivolumab,

resultsThe radiomics signatures predicted treatment sensitivity in the validation dataset of each study group with AUC (95 confidence interval): nivolumab, 0.77 (0.55-1.00); docetaxel, 0.67 (0.37-0.96); and gefitinib, 0.82 (0.53-0.97). Using serial radiographic measurements, the magnitude of exponential increase in signature features deciphering tumor volume, invasion of tumor boundaries, or tumor spatial heterogeneity was associated with shorter overall survival.

conclusionsRadiomics signatures predicted tumor sensitivity to treatment in patients with NSCLC, offering an approach that could enhance clinical decision-making to continue systemic therapies and forecast overall survival.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDisease ProgressionDocetaxelFemaleGefitinibHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleNivolumabPrognosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesDocetaxelGefitinibNivolumab

Identifiers

PMID32198149
PMCPMC9239371
OpenAlexW3011780798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.