Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32197913›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology2020

Aggressive Posterior Retinopathy of Prematurity: Clinical and Quantitative Imaging Features in a Large North American Cohort.

Kellyn N Bellsmith, James Brown, Sang Jin Kim, Isaac H Goldstein, Aaron Coyner, Susan Ostmo, Kishan Gupta, R V Paul Chan, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, Michael F Chiang and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Kellyn N BellsmithDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
James BrownSchool of Computer Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom; Massachusetts General Hospital & Brigham and Women's Hospital Center for Clinical Data Science, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sang Jin KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Ophthalmology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Isaac H GoldsteinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Aaron CoynerDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Susan OstmoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Kishan GuptaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
R V Paul ChanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Jayashree Kalpathy-CramerMassachusetts General Hospital & Brigham and Women's Hospital Center for Clinical Data Science, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michael F ChiangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
J Peter CampbellDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon. Electronic address: campbelp@ohsu.edu.
Oregon Health & Science University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN HEALTH INFORMATICST15LM007088 · NLM · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM R HERSH, Vishnu Mohan · 1992 to 2026
$23.4M
Proteomics CoreP30EY010572 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Kate E Keller · 1995 to 2026
$19.4M
Clinical and Genetic Analysis of Retinopathy of PrematurityR01EY019474 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CAMPBELL, JOHN PETER · 2010 to 2020
$7.0M
Mentored Vision Clinician-Scientist Program at OHSUK12EY027720 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI David Huang · 2018 to 2026
$2.2M
Clinical and genetic analysis of retinopathy of prematurityR01HD107493 · NICHD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CAMPBELL, JOHN PETER · 2021 to 2023
$1.8M
NEI NIH HHS K12 EY027720NEI NIH HHS L30 EY025875NEI NIH HHS P30 EY010572NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019474NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD107493NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity (AP-ROP) is a vision-threatening disease with a significant rate of progression to retinal detachment. The purpose of this study was to characterize AP-ROP quantitatively by demographics, rate of disease progression, and a deep learning-based vascular severity score.

designRetrospective analysis.

participantsThe Imaging and Informatics in ROP cohort from 8 North American centers, consisting of 947 patients and 5945 clinical eye examinations with fundus images, was used. Pretreatment eyes were categorized by disease severity: none, mild, type 2 or pre-plus, treatment-requiring (TR) without AP-ROP, TR with AP-ROP. Analyses compared TR with AP-ROP and TR without AP-ROP to investigate differences between AP-ROP and other TR disease.

methodsA reference standard diagnosis was generated for each eye examination using previously published methods combining 3 independent image-based gradings and 1 ophthalmoscopic grading. All fundus images were analyzed using a previously published deep learning system and were assigned a score from 1 through 9.

main outcome measuresBirth weight, gestational age, postmenstrual age, and vascular severity score.

resultsInfants who demonstrated AP-ROP were more premature by birth weight (617 g vs. 679 g; P = 0.01) and gestational age (24.3 weeks vs. 25.0 weeks; P < 0.01) and reached peak severity at an earlier postmenstrual age (34.7 weeks vs. 36.9 weeks; P < 0.001) compared with infants with TR without AP-ROP. The mean vascular severity score was greatest in TR with AP-ROP infants compared with TR without AP-ROP infants (8.79 vs. 7.19; P < 0.001). Analyzing the severity score over time, the rate of progression was fastest in infants with AP-ROP (P < 0.002 at 30-32 weeks).

conclusionsPremature infants in North America with AP-ROP are born younger and demonstrate disease earlier than infants with less severe ROP. Disease severity is quantifiable with a deep learning-based score, which correlates with clinically identified categories of disease, including AP-ROP. The rate of progression to peak disease is greatest in eyes that demonstrate AP-ROP compared with other treatment-requiring eyes. Analysis of quantitative characteristics of AP-ROP may help improve diagnosis and treatment of an aggressive, vision-threatening form of ROP.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansIncidenceInfant, NewbornMaleNorth AmericaOphthalmoscopyRetinopathy of PrematurityRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID32197913
PMCPMC7384953
OpenAlexW3005473445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.