Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32197880›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2020

Diverging ideas of health? Comparing the basis of health ratings across gender, age, and country.

Patrick Lazarevič, Martina Brandt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Well-Being Adjusted Health Expectancy: A New Summary Measure of Population Health.European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Temporary Agency Work and Well-Being-The Mediating Role of Job Insecurity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patrick LazarevičAustrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna Institute of Demography, Vordere Zollamtsstraße 3, 1030, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: Patrick.Lazarevic@oeaw.ac.at.
Martina BrandtTU Dortmund, Institute for Sociology, Emil-Figge-Str. 50, 44227, Dortmund, Germany. Electronic address: martina.brandt@tu-dortmund.de.

Funding

WEALTH DISPARITIES AMONG MATURE AND OLDER ADULTSP01AG008291 · NIA · RAND CORPORATION · PI HURD, MICHAEL D · 1989 to 2018
$19.4M
RAND CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF AGINGP30AG012815 · NIA · RAND CORPORATION · PI HURD, MICHAEL D · 1999 to 2020
$13.7M
DEVELOPING AN ISRAELI VERSION OF THE HRS/SHARE PROJECTR21AG025169 · NIA · HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM · PI LITWIN, HOWARD · 2004 to 2006
$297k
NIA NIH HHS HHSN271201300071CNIA NIH HHS P01 AG008291NIA NIH HHS P30 AG012815NIA NIH HHS R21 AG025169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-rated health (SRH) is arguably the most widely used generic health measurement in survey research. However, SRH remains a black box for researchers. In our paper, we want to gain a better understanding of SRH by identifying its determinants, quantifying the contribution of different health domains to explain SRH, and by exploring the moderating role of gender, age groups, and the country of residence.

methodUsing data from 61,365 participants of the fifth wave (2013) of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) living in fifteen European countries, we explain SRH via linear regression models. The independent variables are grouped into five health domains: functioning, diseases, pain, mental health, and behavior. Via dominance analysis, we focus on their individual contribution to explaining SRH and compare these contributions across gender, three age groups, and fifteen European countries.

resultsOur model explains SRH rather well (R

conclusionOur paper demonstrates that SRH is largely based on diverse health information with functioning and diseases being most important. However, there is still room for idiosyncrasies or even bias.

Indexed as

AgingEuropeFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleRetirementCross-national comparisonEpidemiologyEuropeMeasurement invarianceResponse behaviorSelf-rated healthSurvey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE)

Identifiers

PMID32197880
PMCPMC7762812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.