ReviewBest practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology2020
Continuing the search for a hormonal male contraceptive.
Review in Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Male contraception development: monitoring effective spermatogenesis suppression utilizing a user-controlled sperm concentration test compared with standard semen analysis.Fertility and sterility · 2023Article
- Blockade of GRTH/DDX25 Phosphorylation by Cyclic Peptides Provides an Avenue for Developing a Nonhormonal Male Contraceptive.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2021Article
- Knowledge and Perception Regarding the Development and Acceptability of Male Contraceptives Among Pharmacists: A Mixed Sequential Method.American journal of men's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This chapter discusses the mechanisms of action of hormonal male contraception, which suppresses the hypothalamic-pituitary-testis axis. When the intratesticular concentration of testosterone is subsequently suppressed to adequately low concentrations, spermatogenesis is arrested. Androgens are a necessary hormonal male contraceptive component because they not only suppress the hypothalamic-pituitary-testis axis, but also provide the male hormone necessary to maintain peripheral androgen functions. Past studies using testosterone alone and testosterone combined with progestins demonstrated contraceptive efficacy in the female partner at rates similar to combined hormonal female methods. Newer hormonal male contraceptive formulations and the alternative routes of administration are discussed, along with potential barriers, challenges, and opportunities for hormonal male contraceptive development. Novel methods that are safe, effective, reversible, user-friendly, and coitus-independent are intrinsic to equitably meet the various needs and limitations of an increasingly diverse population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.