Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32197631›Full record

ArticleTrials2020

Family conferences and shared prioritisation to improve patient safety in the frail elderly (COFRAIL): study protocol of a cluster randomised intervention trial in primary care.

Achim Mortsiefer, Stefan Wilm, Sara Santos, Susanne Löscher, Anja Wollny, Eva Drewelow, Manuela Ritzke, Petra Thürmann, Nina-Kristin Mann, Gabriele Meyer and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Achim MortsieferInstitute of General Practice, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. achim.mortsiefer@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9901-1727
Stefan WilmInstitute of General Practice, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Sara SantosInstitute of General Practice, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Susanne LöscherInstitute of General Practice, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Anja WollnyInstitute of General Practice, University Medical Center Rostock, Doberaner Str. 142, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Eva DrewelowInstitute of General Practice, University Medical Center Rostock, Doberaner Str. 142, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Manuela RitzkeInstitute of General Practice, University Medical Center Rostock, Doberaner Str. 142, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Petra ThürmannDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Heusnerstr. 40, 42283, Wuppertal, Germany.
Nina-Kristin MannDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Heusnerstr. 40, 42283, Wuppertal, Germany.
Gabriele MeyerInstitute for Health and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Str. 8, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Jens AbrahamInstitute for Health and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Str. 8, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Andrea IcksInstitute for Health Services and Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Joseph MontalboInstitute for Health Services and Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Birgitt WieseWG Medical Statistics and IT-Infrastructure, Institute of General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Attila AltinerInstitute of General Practice, University Medical Center Rostock, Doberaner Str. 142, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
COFRAIL study group
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEUniversity of Rostock · DEWitten/Herdecke University · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DE

Funding

Innovationsausschuss beim G-BA 01VSF17053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrailty in elderly patients is associated with an increased risk of poor health outcomes, including falls, delirium, malnutrition, hospitalisation, and mortality. Because polypharmacy is recognised as a possible major contributor to the pathogenesis of geriatric frailty, reducing inappropriate medication exposure is supposed to be a promising approach to improve health-related quality of life and prevent adverse outcomes. A major challenge for the process of deprescribing of inappropriate polypharmacy is to improve the communication between general practitioner (GPs), patient and family carer. This study investigates the effects of a complex intervention in frail elderly patients with polypharmacy living at home.

methodsThis is a cluster randomised controlled trial including 136 GPs and 676 patients. Patients with a positive clinical screening for frailty are eligible if they are aged 70 years or older, receiving family or professional nursing care at home, and taking in five or more drugs per day. Exclusion criteria are higher grade of dementia and life expectancy of 6 months or less. The GPs of the intervention group receive an educational training promoting a deprescribing guideline and providing information on how to conduct a family conference focussing on prioritisation of treatment goals concerning drug therapy. During the 1-year intervention, GPs are expected to perform a total of three family conferences, each including a structured medication review with patients and their family carers. GPs of the control group will receive no training and will deliver care as usual. Geriatric assessment of all patients will be performed by study nurses during home visits at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome is the hospitalisation rate during the observation period of 12 months. Secondary outcomes are number and appropriateness of medications, mobility, weakness, cognition, depressive disorder, health-related quality of life, activities of daily living, weight, and costs of health care use. DISCUSSION: This study will provide evidence for a pragmatic co-operative and patient-centred educational intervention using family conferences to improve patient safety in frail elderly patients with polypharmacy.

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00015055 (WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform [ICTRP]). Registered on 6 February 2019.

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyPatient SafetyPolypharmacyReferral and ConsultationAccidental FallsActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversCluster AnalysisDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleGeneral PractitionersGeriatric AssessmentHouse CallsHumansCluster randomised controlled trialDeprescribingElderly patientsFamily conferencesFrailtyPolypharmacyPrimary careShared decision makingStudy protocol

Identifiers

PMID32197631
PMCPMC7082941
OpenAlexW3011790030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.