ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2020
Predicting individual clinical trajectories of depression with generative embedding.
Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Major depressive disorder associated alterations in the effective connectivity of the face processing network: a systematic review.Translational psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- A network-based analysis anticipates time to recovery from major depression revealing a plasticity by context interplay.Translational psychiatry · 2025Trial
- Antidepressant Use During Pregnancy and Birth Outcomes: Analysis From the UK, Norway, and Sweden.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2026Article
- Comprehensive analysis of interactions between brain aging and late-onset psychoses using heuristic mapping models.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Structurally informed models of directed brain connectivity.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2025Review
- Towards closed-loop precision psychiatry: Integrating MRI biomarkers for individualized care of major depressive disorder.Psychoradiology · 2025Review
- Predicting task-related brain activity from resting-state brain dynamics with fMRI Transformer.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Breakthroughs and challenges for generating brain network-based biomarkers of treatment response in depression.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024Review
- Review
- Transformer-aided dynamic causal model for scalable estimation of effective connectivity.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence significantly facilitates development in the mental health of college students: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Dysconnection and cognition in schizophrenia: A spectral dynamic causal modeling study.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Rising early warning signals in affect associated with future changes in depression: a dynamical systems approach.Psychological medicine · 2023Article
- Predicting treatment outcome in depression: an introduction into current concepts and challenges.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2023Review
- Prevalence and Associated Factors of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress in University Students in Paraguay during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Personalized Diagnosis and Treatment for Neuroimaging in Depressive Disorders.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Brain structural correlates of recurrence following the first episode in patients with major depressive disorder.Translational psychiatry · 2022Article
- Functional MRI in major depressive disorder: A review of findings, limitations, and future prospects.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2022Review
- Test-retest reliability of regression dynamic causal modeling.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2022Article
- Computational approaches to treatment response prediction in major depression using brain activity and behavioral data: A systematic review.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) show heterogeneous treatment response and highly variable clinical trajectories: while some patients experience swift recovery, others show relapsing-remitting or chronic courses. Predicting individual clinical trajectories at an early stage is a key challenge for psychiatry and might facilitate individually tailored interventions. So far, however, reliable predictors at the single-patient level are absent. Here, we evaluated the utility of a machine learning strategy - generative embedding (GE) - which combines interpretable generative models with discriminative classifiers. Specifically, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data of emotional face perception in 85 MDD patients from the NEtherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA) who had been followed up over two years and classified into three subgroups with distinct clinical trajectories. Combining a generative model of effective (directed) connectivity with support vector machines (SVMs), we could predict whether a given patient would experience chronic depression vs. fast remission with a balanced accuracy of 79%. Gradual improvement vs. fast remission could still be predicted above-chance, but less convincingly, with a balanced accuracy of 61%. Generative embedding outperformed classification based on conventional (descriptive) features, such as functional connectivity or local activation estimates, which were obtained from the same data and did not allow for above-chance classification accuracy. Furthermore, predictive performance of GE could be assigned to a specific network property: the trial-by-trial modulation of connections by emotional content. Given the limited sample size of our study, the present results are preliminary but may serve as proof-of-concept, illustrating the potential of GE for obtaining clinical predictions that are interpretable in terms of network mechanisms. Our findings suggest that abnormal dynamic changes of connections involved in emotional face processing might be associated with higher risk of developing a less favorable clinical course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.