Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32197057›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental research2020

Pain Sensitivity Modifies Risk of Injury-Related Temporomandibular Disorder.

S Sharma, R Ohrbach, R B Fillingim, J D Greenspan, G Slade

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Recent Advances in Temporomandibular Joint Surgery.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023
    Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

S SharmaDepartment of Orofacial Pain and Jaw Function, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Skåne, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1887-7420
R OhrbachDepartment of Oral Diagnostic Sciences, University at Buffalo School of Dental Medicine, Buffalo, NY, USA.
R B FillingimDepartment of Community Dentistry & Behavioral Science, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
J D GreenspanDepartment of Neural and Pain Sciences, and Brotman Facial Pain Clinic, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, MD, USA.
G SladeDivision of Pediatric and Population Health, UNC Adams School of Dentistry, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Malmö University · SEUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Risk Factors for Onset and Persistence of TMDU01DE017018 · NIDCR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DIATCHENKO, LUDA, FILLINGIM, ROGER B · 2005 to 2016
$35.9M
Advanced Training in Oral BiologyT32DE023526 · NIDCR · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI Stefan Hans-Klaus Ruhl · 2013 to 2026
$3.7M
NIDCR NIH HHS T32 DE023526NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE017018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates contributions of jaw injury and experimental pain sensitivity to risk of developing painful temporomandibular disorder (TMD). Data were from the Orofacial Pain: Prospective Evaluation and Risk Assessment (OPPERA) nested case-control study of incident painful TMD. Injury and subsequent onset of painful TMD were monitored prospectively for ≤5 y in a community-based sample of 409 US adults who did not have TMD when enrolled. At baseline, thermal-pressure and pinprick pain sensitivity, as potential effect modifiers, were measured using quantitative sensory testing. During follow-up, jaw injury from any of 9 types of potentially traumatic events was determined using quarterly (3-monthly) health update questionnaires. Study examiners classified incident painful TMD, yielding 233 incident cases and 176 matched controls. Logistic regression models, estimated incidence odds ratios (IORs), and 95% confidence limits (CLs) were used for the association between injury and subsequent onset of painful TMD. During follow-up, 38.2% of incident cases and 13.1% of controls reported 1 or more injuries that were 4 times as likely to be intrinsic (i.e., sustained mouth opening or yawning) as extrinsic (e.g., dental visits, whiplash). Injuries due to extrinsic events (IOR = 7.6; 95% CL, 1.6-36.2), sustained opening (IOR = 5.4; 95% CL, 2.4-12.2), and yawning (IOR = 3.4; 95% CL, 1.6-7.3) were associated with increased TMD incidence. Both a single injury (IOR = 6.0; 95% CL, 2.9-12.4) and multiple injuries (IOR = 9.4; 95% CL, 3.4,25.6) predicted greater incidence of painful TMD than events perceived as noninjurious (IOR = 1.9; 95% CL, 1.1-3.4). Injury-associated risk of painful TMD was elevated in people with high sensitivity to heat pain (IOR = 7.4; 95% CL, 3.1-18.0) compared to people with low sensitivity to heat pain (IOR = 3.9; 95% CL, 1.7-8.4). Jaw injury was strongly associated with elevated painful TMD risk, and the risk was amplified in subjects who had enhanced sensitivity to heat pain at enrollment. Commonly occurring but seemingly innocuous events, such as yawning injury, should not be overlooked when judging prognostic importance of jaw injury.

Indexed as

Temporomandibular Joint DisordersCase-Control StudiesFacial PainHumansProspective StudiesRisk Factorscentral sensitizationincidencepain thresholdprospective studiesrisk factorstemporomandibular joint disorders

Identifiers

PMID32197057
PMCPMC7174801
OpenAlexW3010738214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.