Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32197039›Full record

ArticlePain2020

Pharmacological target-focused transcriptomic analysis of native vs cultured human and mouse dorsal root ganglia.

Andi Wangzhou, Lisa A McIlvried, Candler Paige, Paulino Barragan-Iglesias, Stephanie Shiers, Ayesha Ahmad, Carolyn A Guzman, Gregory Dussor, Pradipta R Ray, Robert W Gereau and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. In Vivo Expression of an SCA27A-LinkedThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Nociceptors use multiple neurotransmitters to drive pain.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andi WangzhouSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Center for Advanced Pain Studies, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Lisa A McIlvriedDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University Pain Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Candler PaigeSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Center for Advanced Pain Studies, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Paulino Barragan-IglesiasSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Center for Advanced Pain Studies, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Stephanie ShiersSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Center for Advanced Pain Studies, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Ayesha AhmadSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Center for Advanced Pain Studies, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Carolyn A GuzmanSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Center for Advanced Pain Studies, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Gregory DussorSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Center for Advanced Pain Studies, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Pradipta R RaySchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Center for Advanced Pain Studies, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Robert W GereauDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University Pain Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Theodore J PriceSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Center for Advanced Pain Studies, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
The University of Texas at Dallas · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH TRAINING IN DRUG ABUSET32DA007261 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ARPANA AGRAWAL, Jose A Moron-Concepcion · 1991 to 2026
$8.8M
Translation Control of Pain PlasticityR01NS065926 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI PRICE, THEODORE J. · 2010 to 2023
$5.7M
MECHANISMS OF PERIPHERAL MGLUR MODULATION OF NOCICEPTIONR01NS042595 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GEREAU, ROBERT W · 2002 to 2017
$5.2M
Mechanisms of Central SensitizationR01NS106953 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GEREAU, ROBERT W · 2018 to 2022
$2.7M
Sex-specific regulation of local translation and chronic pain mechanisms in femalesR01NS102161 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI AKOPIAN, ARMEN N, PRICE, THEODORE J. · 2018 to 2022
$2.5M
Identification of Sex Specific Regulatory Drug Targets for Chronic Neuropathic PainF99NS113457 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI PAIGE, CANDLER ANN · 2019 to 2020
$81k
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007261NINDS NIH HHS F99 NS113457NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS042595NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS065926NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS102161NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS106953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons detect sensory inputs and are crucial for pain processing. They are often studied in vitro as dissociated cell cultures with the assumption that this reasonably represents in vivo conditions. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has directly compared genome-wide transcriptomes of DRG tissue in vivo versus in vitro or between laboratories and culturing protocols. Comparing RNA sequencing-based transcriptomes of native to cultured (4 days in vitro) human or mouse DRG, we found that the overall expression levels of many ion channels and G-protein-coupled receptors specifically expressed in neurons are markedly lower although still expressed in culture. This suggests that most pharmacological targets expressed in vivo are present under the condition of dissociated cell culture, but with changes in expression levels. The reduced relative expression for neuronal genes in human DRG cultures is likely accounted for by increased expression of genes in fibroblast-like and other proliferating cells, consistent with their mitotic status in these cultures. We found that the expression of a subset of genes typically expressed in neurons increased in human and mouse DRG cultures relative to the intact ganglion, including genes associated with nerve injury or inflammation in preclinical models such as BDNF, MMP9, GAL, and ATF3. We also found a striking upregulation of a number of inflammation-associated genes in DRG cultures, although many were different between mouse and human. Our findings suggest an injury-like phenotype in DRG cultures that has important implications for the use of this model system for pain drug discovery.

Indexed as

Ganglia, SpinalTranscriptomeAnimalsCells, CulturedHumansMiceNeuronsPain

Identifiers

PMID32197039
PMCPMC7305999
OpenAlexW3010645005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.