Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32197017›Full record

ArticleJBI evidence synthesis2020

Psychological stress and pancreatic cancer patients: a qualitative systematic review protocol.

Ann M Mazzella Ebstein, Simi Jesto Joseph, Marisol Hernandez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JBI evidence synthesis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ann M Mazzella EbsteinMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Simi Jesto JosephThe Center for Translational Research: a Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence.
Marisol HernandezMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe primary objective of this review is to analyze and synthesize the best available evidence on the experiences and perceptions of psychological stress reported by pancreatic cancer patients at any time point from pre-diagnosis, diagnosis, treatment, post-treatment and/or follow-up care.

introductionA cancer diagnosis is known to be life-threatening, altering and limiting, and negatively affects an individual's activities of daily living. Despite developments in treatment options for pancreatic cancer patients, it represents the highest mortality and morbidity among cancers. Stress is a subjective phenomenon that negatively impacts an individual's psychological and emotional well-being, and interferes with the ability to cope with cancer symptoms and treatments. Identifying a patient's experience of stress could facilitate educational, spiritual and social resources to address his or her emotional and psychological needs. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Qualitative studies that include individuals with pancreatic cancers, regardless of age, sex or ethnicity, will be considered for inclusion in this review.

methodsThe databases to be searched include PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, BioMed Central and PsycINFO. The search for gray literature will include Biosis, OpenGrey, Open Access Theses and Dissertations, and WorldCat. This systematic review will consider all published and unpublished studies with no date limitations. Selected studies will be assessed for methodological quality by two independent reviewers. Coding will be assigned to synthesize any differences in the experiences and perceptions of psychological stress at four time points. Where textual pooling is not possible, conclusions will be presented in narrative form.

Indexed as

Stress, PsychologicalActivities of Daily LivingAdaptation, PsychologicalHumansPancreatic NeoplasmsQualitative ResearchResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID32197017
PMCPMC7513383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.