ArticleESC heart failure2020
Outcomes of patients after successful left ventricular assist device explantation: a EUROMACS study.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Myocardial recovery in children supported with a durable ventricular assist device-a systematic review.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Artifactual declines in durable LVAD utilization among heart transplant candidates: Selection bias in transplant registries.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2026Article
- Decommissioning of Durable Left Ventricular Assist Devices.CJC open · 2026Article
- Case report: decommissioning of a left ventricular assist device following reverse remodeling in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy patient.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Indication for durable mechanical circulatory support: an expert opinion review.ESC heart failure · 2026Review
- Pediatric Myocarditis: Challenges in Diagnosis and Treatment.Paediatric drugs · 2026Review
- Heart Replacement Therapy in Young Patients: A Comparative Analysis of HeartMate 3 LVAD and Heart Transplant Using MOMENTUM 3 and UNOS Registry.JACC. Heart failure · 2026Article
- International Utah Cardiac Recovery Symposium (U-CARS) 2025: Clinical Science Proceedings.Heart failure reviews · 2026Article
- High-volume centers achieve superior outcomes in left ventricular assist device explant-heart transplantation.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Article
- From support to recovery: the evolving role of LVAD in reversing heart failure.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Review
- The Liver Knows: Preoperative MELD Score as a Predictor of Outcome in Patients Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation. A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- A Traumatic and Infected Left Ventricular Pseudoaneurysm 2 years After the Explantation of a Bridge-to-Recovery Left Ventricular Assist Device.International medical case reports journal · 2025Article
- Deactivation of LVAD support for myocardial recovery-surgical perspectives.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2024Review
- Review
- Impact of Diabetes and Glycemia on Cardiac Improvement and Adverse Events Following Mechanical Circulatory Support.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Predictors of long-term success after successful explantation of continuous flow left ventricular assist device support.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Patient-tailored silicone plug for HeartMate 3™ left ventricular assist device explantation.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2024Article
- Myocardial Recovery in the Systemic Context: A Philosophic Shift for the Heart Failure Subspecialty to Optimize Patient Care.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2024Review
- Benchtop Models of Patient-Specific Intraventricular Flow During Heart Failure and LVAD Support.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimsSufficient myocardial recovery with the subsequent explantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) occurs in approximately 1-2% of the cases. However, follow-up data about this condition are scarcely available in the literature. This study aimed to report the long-term outcomes and clinical management following LVAD explantation. METHODS AND
resultsAn analysis of the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support was performed to identify all adult patients with myocardial recovery and successful explantation. Pre-implant characteristics were retrieved and compared with the non-recovery patients. The follow-up data after explantation were collected via a questionnaire. A Kaplan-Meier analysis for freedom of the composite endpoint of death, heart transplantation, LVAD reimplantion, or heart failure (HF) relapse was conducted. A total of 45 (1.4%) cases with myocardial recovery resulting in successful LVAD explantation were identified. Compared with those who did not experience myocardial recovery, the explanted patients were younger (44 vs. 56 years, P < 0.001), had a shorter duration of cardiac disease (P < 0.001), and were less likely to have ischaemic cardiomyopathy (9% vs. 41.8%, P < 0.001). Follow-up after explantation could be acquired in 28 (62%) cases. The median age at LVAD implantation was 43 years (inter-quartile range: 29-52), and 23 (82%) were male. Baseline left ventricular ejection fraction was 18% (inter-quartile range: 10-20%), and 60.7% of the patients had Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support Profile 1 or 2. Aetiologies of HF were dilated cardiomyopathy in 36%, myocarditis in 32%, and ischaemic in 14% of the patients, and 18% had miscellaneous aetiologies. The devices implanted were HeartMate II in 14 (50%), HVAD in 11 (39%), HeartMate 3 in 2 (7%), and 1 unknown with a median duration of support of 410 days (range: 59-1286). The median follow-up after explantation was 26 months (range 0.3-73 months), and 82% of the patients were in New York Heart Association Class I or II. Beta-blockers were prescribed to 85%, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors to 71%, and loop diuretics to 50% of the patients, respectively. Freedom from the composite endpoint was 100% after 30 days and 88% after 2 years.
conclusionsThe survival after LVAD explantation is excellent without the need for heart transplantation or LVAD reimplantation. Only a minority of the patients suffer from a relapse of significant HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.