ArticleInternational journal of older people nursing2020
Strategies to facilitate shared decision-making in long-term care.
Article in International journal of older people nursing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Healthcare professionals' perceptions of participation and learning related to mealtimes in long-term care facilities: an interview study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Shared Decision-Making on Drinking Alcohol in Older Adults Living in Residential Care Facilities: Care Professionals' Perspectives.International journal of older people nursing · 2026Article
- Caring in Ambulance Encounters With Older Patients With Complex Care Needs: A Phenomenographic Study.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2026Article
- The influence of the practice environment on sharing decision making between older persons and nurses in residential aged care: a qualitative person-centred study.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- "The first transition is from resident to patient": understanding the decisional needs of long-term care residents preparing for hospital transitions.The Gerontologist · 2025Article
- Relationship-Centered Care for Older Adults in Long-Term Care Homes: A Scoping Review.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2025Article
- A Narrative Exploration of Family Members' Perspectives of Life Story Phases Following Transition of an Older Family Relative Into Long-Term Care.International journal of older people nursing · 2025Article
- Resident- and family-led huddles for collaborative care planning in long-term care: a feasibility study.Innovation in aging · 2025Article
- Invited review: Enabling shared decision making in gerontological nursing: Barriers and facilitators.Journal of Korean gerontological nursing · 2024Article
- Barriers and Stimulus in Shared Decision Making Among Aesthetic Dermatologists in China: Findings from a Cross-Sectional Study.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2024Article
- Relational practice in health, education, criminal justice, and social care: a scoping review.Systematic reviews · 2023Article
- Factors influencing shared decision-making in long-term care facilities.BMC geriatrics · 2023Article
- Using Shared Decision-Making Resources in Long-Term Care: a Qualitative Study.Canadian geriatrics journal : CGJ · 2023Article
- Exploring resident experiences of person-centred care at mealtimes in long-term residential care: a rapid ethnography.BMC geriatrics · 2022Article
- Article
- The factors that influence care home residents' and families' engagement with decision-making about their care and support: an integrative review of the literature.BMC geriatrics · 2022Review
- Building a new life: a qualitative study of how family carers deal with significant changes.BMC geriatrics · 2022Article
- Communication Disparities between Nursing Home Team Members.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Preference of caregivers on residential care homes for older persons with versus without communication problems: a discrete choice experiment.BMC geriatrics · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThe aim of this study was to explore shared decision-making among residents, their families and staff to determine relevant strategies to support shared decision-making in long-term care (LTC).
backgroundMeaningful engagement of long-term care home (LTCH) residents and their families in care decisions is key in the provision of quality of care. Shared decision-making is an interprofessional approach to increasing resident and family engagement in care decisions which can lead to higher quality decisions, more relevant care interventions and greater resident, family, and staff satisfaction. Despite these advantages, shared decision-making has not been widely implemented in practice in LTC.
methodsThe study took place in one LTCH in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. A qualitative descriptive design was used to explore how residents, family members and staff described how they collaborate when making decisions concerning resident care, and their perceptions of facilitators and challenges to a collaborative approach to decision-making. Individual interviews were conducted with nine participants: residents, families and staff. Data were analysed using content and thematic analysis.
findingsFour main themes that described resident, family and staff perspectives of shared decision-making were as follows: (a) oral communication pathways for information sharing; (b) supporting resident decision-making autonomy; (c) relational aspects of care facilitate shared decision-making; and (d) lack of effective communication creates barriers to shared decision-making.
conclusionAs the demand for LTC continues to increase, it is crucial that healthcare providers engage in collaborative, relational practices that foster high-quality resident care. While a relational approach to care can facilitate shared decision-making, there are opportunities to further cultivate shared decision-making in LTCHs through more effective communication and collaboration. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Understanding how information is shared and decisions are made can facilitate shared decision-making in LTCHs. The strategies identified from this study could be further co-developed and implemented in LTCHs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.