ArticleJournal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH2020
FVIII activity following FVIII protein infusion or FVIII gene transfer predicts the bleeding risk in hemophilia A rats.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProphylactic replacement therapy in hemophilia A (HA) patients does not adequately prevent bleeds and arthropathic complications. A more refined understanding of the relationship between coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) levels and bleeding risk during protein prophylaxis, or with gene therapy, is needed to improve patient care.
objectivesInvestigate this relationship in the HA rat, a model exhibiting spontaneous bleeds and development of arthropathy similar to HA patients.
methodsHuman B domain-deleted FVIII was delivered to HA rats via adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated gene transfer or multiple intravenous protein injections. RESULTS AND
conclusionsAfter 12 weeks of observation, both approaches significantly reduced bleeds per animal and increased the proportion of bleed-free animals compared with controls (43% vs 0%, respectively [AAV]; 75% vs 8%, respectively [injection]). Both approaches resulted in an anti-FVIII inhibitory response in 20% to 37% of treated animals, similar to HA patients. Inhibitory antibodies were refractory to clinical improvement (reduction of bleeds) only in the AAV-based prophylaxis. An integrated model-based analysis of data on FVIII exposure and bleeding events was performed. This predicted the bleeding risk at any given circulating FVIII activity. Specifically, 4.8 or 10 IU/dL FVIII (0.048 and 0.1 IU/mL, respectively) were predicted to reduce bleeding risk by 90% or 95%, respectively, compared with untreated controls. Our data establish the utility of the HA rat model in FVIII prophylaxis studies and describe how FVIII activity affects bleeding risk in this setting. These enable further studies on FVIII prophylaxis focusing on disease complications for an optimized treatment of HA patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.