Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32196789›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2020

Trends in marijuana use in two Latin American countries: an age, period and cohort study.

Alvaro Castillo-Carniglia, Ariadne Rivera-Aguirre, Esteban Calvo, Rosario Queirolo, Katherine M Keyes, Magdalena Cerdá

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Relationship between Everyday Discrimination and Substance Use among Adolescents in Northern Chile.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Alvaro Castillo-CarnigliaSociety and Health Research Center, Universidad Mayor, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-3016-890X
Ariadne Rivera-AguirreDepartment of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4860-2791
Esteban CalvoSociety and Health Research Center, Universidad Mayor, Santiago, Chile.
Rosario QueiroloDepartment of Social and Political Sciences, Universidad Católica Uruguay, Montevideo, Uruguay.ORCID 0000-0002-4385-8045
Katherine M KeyesSociety and Health Research Center, Universidad Mayor, Santiago, Chile.
Magdalena CerdáDepartment of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8441-7046
Universidad Mayor · CLNew York University · USUniversidad Católica del Uruguay · UY

Funding

Health and social consequences of national marijuana legalizationR01DA040924 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CERDA, MAGDALENA · 2016 to 2019
$1.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA040924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsUruguay and Chile have the highest levels of marijuana use in Latin America, and have experienced consistent increases during the last two decades. We aim to calculate separate age-period-cohort (APC) effects for past-year marijuana use in Uruguay and Chile, which have similar epidemiologica, and demographic profiles but diverging paths in cannabis regulation.

designAPC study in which period and cohort effects were estimated as first derivative deviations from their linear age trend, separately by country and gender.

settingUruguay and Chile.

participantsGeneral population between 15 and 64 years. MEASUREMENTS: Past-year marijuana use from household surveys with five repeated cross-sections between 2001 and 2018 in Uruguay (median n = 4616) and 13 between 1994 and 2018 in Chile (median n = 15 895).

findingsMarijuana use prevalence in both countries peaked at 20-24 years of age and increased consistently across calendar years. Period effects were strong and positive, indicating that increases in use were evident across age groups. Relative to 2006 (reference year), Chilean period effects were approximately 48% lower in 1994 and approximately four times higher in 2018; in Uruguay, these effects were approximately 56% lower in 2001 and almost quadrupled in 2018. We observed non-linear cohort effects in Chile and similar patterns in Uruguay for the overall sample and women. In both countries, marijuana use increased for cohorts born between the mid-1970s and early 1990s, even in the context of rising period effects. Prevalence was consistently larger for men, but period increases were stronger in women.

conclusionsAge-period-cohort effects on past-year marijuana use appear to have been similar in Chile and Uruguay, decreasing with age and increasing over time at heterogeneous growth rates depending on gender and cohort. Current levels of marijuana use, including age and gender disparities, seem to be associated with recent common historical events in these two countries.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAge FactorsChileCohort EffectCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMarijuana UseMiddle AgedPrevalenceSex FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesUruguayYoung AdultAgeChilecohortmarijuanaperiodUruguay

Identifiers

PMID32196789
PMCPMC7502472
OpenAlexW3011426282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.