ArticlePloS one2020
Genome-based species-specific primers for rapid identification of six species of Lactobacillus acidophilus group using multiplex PCR.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- SURE-Pipe: a pipeline to compare genomes and extract shared and unique regions.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Enhancement of isoflavone aglycones, GABA, and mineral bioavailability inFood chemistry: X · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Quality of Selected Commercial Probiotic Products, Both Dietary Supplements and Foods for Special Medical Purposes.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Microalga Chlorella vulgaris Supplements as a Factor Increasing the Survival of Potentially Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria Under Environmental Stress Conditions.Environmental microbiology reports · 2025Article
- Diagnosis by Volatile Organic Compounds in Exhaled Breath in Exhaled Breath from Patients with Gastric and Colorectal Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Identification of novel molecular targets for Weissella species-specific real-time PCR based on pangenome analysis.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Microbiological Testing of Probiotic Preparations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many Lactobacillus species are frequently isolated from dairy products, animal guts, and the vaginas of healthy women. However, sequencing-based identification of isolated Lactobacillus strain is time/cost-consuming and lobor-intensive. In this study, we developed a multiplex PCR method to distinguish six closely related species in the Lactobacillus acidophilus group (L. gasseri, L. acidophilus, L. helveticus, L. jensenii, L. crispatus, and L. gallinarum), which is based on species-specific primer sets. Altogether, 86 genomes of 9 Lactobacillus species from the National Center of Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database were compared to detect species-specific genes and design six species-specific primer sets. The PCR conditions of the individual primer sets were optimized via gradient PCR methods. A final multiplex PCR condition was also optimized for a mixture of all six primer sets mixed. When identifying a single strain, the optimized multiplex PCR method can specifically detect one of the six species, but no band was amplified at least from the other Lactobacillus and Enterococcus species. These results indicated that species-specific primer sets designed from the genome comparison could identify one strain within the six Lactobacillus species by a single PCR reaction. Using the method described here, we will be able to save time, cost, and labor during species identification and screening of commercially important probiotic lactobacilli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.