ArticlePloS one2020
Considering patient clinical history impacts performance of machine learning models in predicting course of multiple sclerosis.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient-reported outcomes as predictors of disability evolution in Multiple Sclerosis: An interpretable machine learning approach.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Analysis Applied to Prediction of Early Progression Independent of Relapse Activity in Multiple Sclerosis Patients.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Performance of machine learning models for predicting high-severity symptoms in multiple sclerosis.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Conformal prediction enables disease course prediction and allows individualized diagnostic uncertainty in multiple sclerosis.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Digital remote monitoring of people with multiple sclerosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Prognostic models for predicting clinical disease progression, worsening and activity in people with multiple sclerosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Review
- In silico clinical trials for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with MS TreatSim.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Machine learning methods to predict 30-day hospital readmission outcome among US adults with pneumonia: analysis of the national readmission database.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Extending artificial intelligence research in the clinical domain: a theoretical perspective.Annals of operations research · 2022Article
- Predicting disease activity in patients with multiple sclerosis: An explainable machine-learning approach in the Mavenclad trials.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2022Article
- Comparison of Machine Learning Methods Using Spectralis OCT for Diagnosis and Disability Progression Prognosis in Multiple Sclerosis.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2022Article
- Classification of multiple sclerosis clinical profiles using machine learning and grey matter connectome.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2022Article
- Role of artificial intelligence in MS clinical practice.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2022Review
- Towards Multimodal Machine Learning Prediction of Individual Cognitive Evolution in Multiple Sclerosis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Review
- Machine Learning Use for Prognostic Purposes in Multiple Sclerosis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Machine Learning Techniques for Personalised Medicine Approaches in Immune-Mediated Chronic Inflammatory Diseases: Applications and Challenges.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Prediction of disease progression and outcomes in multiple sclerosis with machine learning.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Explainable machine learning for predicting conversion to neurological disease: Results from 52,939 medical records.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) progresses at an unpredictable rate, but predictions on the disease course in each patient would be extremely useful to tailor therapy to the individual needs. We explore different machine learning (ML) approaches to predict whether a patient will shift from the initial Relapsing-Remitting (RR) to the Secondary Progressive (SP) form of the disease, using only "real world" data available in clinical routine. The clinical records of 1624 outpatients (207 in the SP phase) attending the MS service of Sant'Andrea hospital, Rome, Italy, were used. Predictions at 180, 360 or 720 days from the last visit were obtained considering either the data of the last available visit (Visit-Oriented setting), comparing four classical ML methods (Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbours and AdaBoost) or the whole clinical history of each patient (History-Oriented setting), using a Recurrent Neural Network model, specifically designed for historical data. Missing values were handled by removing either all clinical records presenting at least one missing parameter (Feature-saving approach) or the 3 clinical parameters which contained missing values (Record-saving approach). The performances of the classifiers were rated using common indicators, such as Recall (or Sensitivity) and Precision (or Positive predictive value). In the visit-oriented setting, the Record-saving approach yielded Recall values from 70% to 100%, but low Precision (5% to 10%), which however increased to 50% when considering only predictions for which the model returned a probability above a given "confidence threshold". For the History-oriented setting, both indicators increased as prediction time lengthened, reaching values of 67% (Recall) and 42% (Precision) at 720 days. We show how "real world" data can be effectively used to forecast the evolution of MS, leading to high Recall values and propose innovative approaches to improve Precision towards clinically useful values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.