Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32196508›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Shotguns vs Lasers: Identifying barriers and facilitators to scaling-up plant molecular farming for high-value health products.

Jonathan Menary, Matthew Hobbs, Sara Mesquita de Albuquerque, Agata Pacho, Pascal M W Drake, Alison Prendiville, Julian K-C Ma, Sebastian S Fuller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Product safety aspects of plant molecular farming.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  3. Genetic Containment for Molecular Farming.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jonathan MenaryInstitute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, Tooting, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0156-0619
Matthew HobbsInstitute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, Tooting, London, United Kingdom.
Sara Mesquita de AlbuquerqueInstitute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, Tooting, London, United Kingdom.
Agata PachoInstitute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, Tooting, London, United Kingdom.
Pascal M W DrakeInstitute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, Tooting, London, United Kingdom.
Alison PrendivilleLondon College of Communication, University of the Arts, London, United Kingdom.
Julian K-C MaInstitute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, Tooting, London, United Kingdom.
Sebastian S FullerInstitute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, Tooting, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9284-6630

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant molecular farming (PMF) is a convenient and cost-effective way to produce high-value recombinant proteins that can be used in the production of a range of health products, from pharmaceutical therapeutics to cosmetic products. New plant breeding techniques (NPBTs) provide a means to enhance PMF systems more quickly and with greater precision than ever before. However, the feasibility, regulatory standing and social acceptability of both PMF and NPBTs are in question. This paper explores the perceptions of key stakeholders on two European Union (EU) Horizon 2020 programmes-Pharma-Factory and Newcotiana-towards the barriers and facilitators of PMF and NPBTs in Europe. One-on-one qualitative interviews were undertaken with N = 20 individuals involved in one or both of the two projects at 16 institutions in seven countries (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Israel, Spain and the UK). The findings indicate that the current EU regulatory environment and the perception of the public towards biotechnology are seen as the main barriers to scaling-up PMF and NPBTs. Competition from existing systems and the lack of plant-specific regulations likewise present challenges for PMF developing beyond its current niche. However, respondents felt that the communication of the benefits and purpose of NPBT PMF could provide a platform for improving the social acceptance of genetic modification. The importance of the media in this process was highlighted. This article also uses the multi-level perspective to explore the ways in which NPBTs are being legitimated by interested parties and the systemic factors that have shaped and are continuing to shape the development of PMF in Europe.

Indexed as

Molecular FarmingPlant BreedingBiotechnologyEuropean UnionGene EditingGenetic EngineeringHumansNicotianaPlant DevelopmentPlantsPlants, Genetically Modified

Identifiers

PMID32196508
PMCPMC7083274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.