Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32195972›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2020

Comparison of MRI and MRA for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears: A meta-analysis.

Fanxiao Liu, Xiangyun Cheng, Jinlei Dong, Dongsheng Zhou, Shumei Han, Yongliang Yang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07456215 (The Effect of Platelet Rich Plasma), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07456215 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) Application on Rotator Cuff Tear.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAristotle University Of ThessalonikiRan2022 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsTendon Injuries, Supraspinatus Injury, PRPArmsPlatelet Rich Plasma, Normal saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Comparison of the Clinical Examination, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Intraoperative].Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prevalence of Appropriate Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in a Large Multicenter US Cohort Using a RAND/UCLA Algorithm.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Toward non-invasive diagnosis of Bankart lesions with deep learning.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fanxiao LiuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong.
Xiangyun ChengDepartment of Orthopaedics, The 2nd Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi.
Jinlei DongDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong.
Dongsheng ZhouDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong.
Shumei HanDepartment of Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Yongliang YangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong.
Shandong Provincial Hospital · CNShandong University · CNShanxi Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNumerous quantitatively based studies measuring the accuracy of MRI and MRA for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears remain inconclusive. In order to compare the accuracy of MRI with MRA in detection of rotator cuff tears a meta-analysis was performed systematically.

methodsPubMed/Medline and Embase were utilized to retrieve articles comparing the diagnostic performance of MRI and MRA for use in detecting rotator cuff tears. After screening and diluting out the articles that met inclusion criteria to be used for statistical analysis the pooled evaluation indexes including sensitivity and specificity as well as hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curves with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.

resultsScreening determined that 12 studies involving a total of 1030 patients and 1032 shoulders were deemed viable for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The results of the analysis showed that MRA has a higher sensitivity and specificity than MRI for the detection of any tear; similar results were observed in the detection of full-thickness tears. However, for the detection of partial-thickness tear, MRI has similar performance with MRA.

conclusionMRI is recommended to be a first-choice imaging modality for the detection of rotator cuff tears. Although MRA have a higher sensitivity and specificity, it cannot replace MRI after the comprehensive consideration of accuracy and practicality.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArthrographyFemaleHumansLacerationsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRotator CuffRotator Cuff InjuriesRuptureSensitivity and SpecificityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32195972
PMCPMC7220562
OpenAlexW3011606834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.