Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32195533›Full record

ArticleInflammatory bowel diseases2021

Utility of the MARS-5 in Assessing Medication Adherence in IBD.

James K Stone, Leigh Anne Shafer, Lesley A Graff, Lisa Lix, Kelcie Witges, Laura E Targownik, Clove Haviva, Kathryn Sexton, Charles N Bernstein

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James K StoneUniversity of Manitoba Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Leigh Anne ShaferUniversity of Manitoba Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Lesley A GraffUniversity of Manitoba Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinical and Research Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Lisa LixUniversity of Manitoba Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinical and Research Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Kelcie WitgesUniversity of Manitoba Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinical and Research Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Laura E TargownikUniversity of Manitoba Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinical and Research Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Clove HavivaUniversity of Manitoba Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinical and Research Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Kathryn SextonUniversity of Manitoba Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinical and Research Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Charles N BernsteinUniversity of Manitoba Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
University of Manitoba · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe aimed to validate the Medication Adherence Report Scale-5 (MARS-5) as a tool for assessing medication adherence in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and to determine predictors of medication adherence.

methodsOne hundred twelve (N = 112) adults with confirmed IBD participating in the longitudinal Manitoba Living With IBD Study were eligible. Demographics, IBD type, surgeries, disease activity (using the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Symptom Inventory and fecal calprotectin levels), perceived stress, and medication use were collected biweekly through online surveys. The MARS-5 scores were obtained at baseline and at 1 year. Correlation between medication monitoring data and MARS-5 scores was performed and the optimal MARS-5 cutoff point for adherence assessment determined. Predictors of medication adherence were assessed at both ≥90% and ≥80%.

resultsParticipants were predominantly female (71.4%), mean age was 42.9 (SD = 12.8), and the majority (67.9%) had Crohn disease (CD). Almost half (46.4%) were taking more than 1 IBD medication, with thiopurines (41.9%) and biologics (36.6%) the most common. Only 17.9% (n = 20) were nonadherent at a <90% level; of those, 90% (n = 18) were using oral medications. The MARS-5 was significantly associated with adherence based on medication monitoring data at baseline (r = 0.48) and week 52 (r = 0.57). Sensitivity and specificity for adherence ≥80% and ≥90% were maximized at MARS-5 scores of >22 and >23, respectively. Having CD (OR = 4.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-15.7) was the only significant predictor of adherence.

conclusionMARS-5 is a useful measure to evaluate adherence in an IBD population. In this highly adherent sample, disease type (CD) was the only predictor of medication adherence.

Indexed as

Crohn DiseaseDrug MonitoringInflammatory Bowel DiseasesAdultChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID32195533
PMCPMC7885329
OpenAlexW3011362304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.