ArticlePhysical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP2020
Impact of electronic polarizability on protein-functional group interactions.
Article in Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Drude SILCS-Nucleic: harnessing explicit electronic polarization in targeting RNA and DNA for drug design.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Article
- Drude SILCS-Nucleic: Harnessing Explicit Electronic Polarization in Targeting RNA and DNA for Drug Design.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Electric charge and salting in/out effects on glucagon's dipole moments and polarizabilities using the GruPol database.Acta crystallographica Section B, Structural science, crystal engineering and materials · 2025Article
- Modeling Ligand Binding Site Water Networks with Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation: Impact on Ligand Binding Orientations and Relative Binding Affinities.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Four-Dimensional Scaling of Dipole Polarizability: From Single-Particle Models to Atoms and Molecules.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Efficient Sampling of Cavity Hydration in Proteins with Nonequilibrium Grand Canonical Monte Carlo and Polarizable Force Fields.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Identification of Family-Specific Features in Cas9 and Cas12 Proteins: A Machine Learning Approach Using Complete Protein Feature Spectrum.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Combining SILCS and Artificial Intelligence for High-Throughput Prediction of the Passive Permeability of Drug Molecules.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023Article
- Selectivity and Ranking of Tight-Binding JAK-STAT Inhibitors Using Markovian Milestoning with Voronoi Tessellations.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023Article
- Effects of temperature and microwave on the stability of the blast effector complex APikL2A/sHMA25 as determined by molecular dynamics analyses.Journal of molecular modeling · 2023Article
- Computer-Aided Drug Design: An Update.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- hERG Blockade Prediction by Combining Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation and Physicochemical Properties.Chemistry (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Application of Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation in Computer-Aided Drug Design.New journal of chemistry = Nouveau journal de chimie · 2022Article
- Atomistic Polarizable Embeddings: Energy, Dynamics, Spectroscopy, and Reactivity.Accounts of chemical research · 2021Article
- Rapid and accurate estimation of protein-ligand relative binding affinities using site-identification by ligand competitive saturation.Chemical science · 2021Article
- A fast and high-quality charge model for the next generation general AMBER force field.The Journal of chemical physics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Interactions of proteins with functional groups are key to their biological functions, making it essential that they be accurately modeled. To investigate the impact of the inclusion of explicit treatment of electronic polarizability in force fields on protein-functional group interactions, the additive CHARMM and Drude polarizable force field are compared in the context of the Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) simulation methodology from which functional group interaction patterns with five proteins for which experimental binding affinities of multiple ligands are available, were obtained. The explicit treatment of polarizability produces significant differences in the functional group interactions in the ligand binding sites including overall enhanced binding of functional groups to the proteins. This is associated with variations of the dipole moments of solutes representative of functional groups in the binding sites relative to aqueous solution with higher dipole moments systematically occurring in the latter, though exceptions occur with positively charged methylammonium. Such variation indicates the complex, heterogeneous nature of the electronic environments of ligand binding sites and emphasizes the inherent limitation of fixed charged, additive force fields for modeling ligand-protein interactions. These effects yield more defined orientation of the functional groups in the binding pockets and a small, but systematic improvement in the ability of the SILCS method to predict the binding orientation and relative affinities of ligands to their target proteins. Overall, these results indicate that the physical model associated with the explicit treatment of polarizability along with the presence of lone pairs in a force field leads to changes in the nature of the interactions of functional groups with proteins versus that occurring with additive force fields, suggesting the utility of polarizable force fields in obtaining a more realistic understanding of protein-ligand interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.