Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32195316›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2020

Extent of the difference between microcatheter and pressure wire-derived fractional flow reserve and its relation to optical coherence tomography-derived parameters.

Yoshiki Matsuo, Yasutsugu Shiono, Kuninobu Kashiyama, Yasushi Ino, Takahiro Nishi, Kosei Terada, Hiroki Emori, Daisuke Higashioka, Yosuke Katayama, Amir Khalifa Mahfouz and 10 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yoshiki MatsuoThe Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Yasutsugu ShionoThe Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Kuninobu KashiyamaThe Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Yasushi InoThe Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Takahiro NishiThe Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Kosei TeradaThe Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Hiroki EmoriThe Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Daisuke HigashiokaThe Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Yosuke KatayamaThe Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Amir Khalifa MahfouzThe Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Teruaki WadaThe Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Suwako FujitaThe Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Masahiro TakahataThe Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Kunihiro ShimamuraThe Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Manabu KashiwagiThe Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Akio KuroiThe Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Atsushi TanakaThe Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Takeshi HozumiThe Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Takashi KuboThe Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Takashi AkasakaThe Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Wakayama Medical University · JPUniversity of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough previous studies demonstrated that microcatheter-derived fractional flow reserve (mc-FFR) tends to overestimate lesion severity compared to pressure wire-derived FFR (pw-FFR), the clinical utility of mc-FFR remains obscure. The extent of differences between the two FFR systems and its relation to a lesion-specific parameter remain unknown. In this study, we sought to compare mc-FFR with pw-FFR and determine the lower and upper mc-FFR cut-offs predicting ischemic and non-ischemic stenosis, using an METHODS AND

resultsIn this study, 44 target vessels with intermediate de novo coronary artery lesion in 36 patients with stable ischemic heart disease were evaluated with mc-FFR, pw-FFR and OCT. Bland-Altman plots for mc-FFR versus pw-FFR showed a bias of -0.04 for lower mc-FFR values compared to pw-FFR values. The mc-FFR cut-off values of 0.73 and 0.79 corresponded to the 0.75

conclusionMc-FFR is clinically useful when the specific cut-offs are applied. An OCT-derived MLA accounts for

Indexed as

Decision-makingFractional flow reserveMicrocatheterMinimum lumen areaOptical coherence tomographyPressure wire

Identifiers

PMID32195316
PMCPMC7075984
OpenAlexW3011602489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.