Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32195270›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2020

Deep Learning for Cardiac Image Segmentation: A Review.

Chen Chen, Chen Qin, Huaqi Qiu, Giacomo Tarroni, Jinming Duan, Wenjia Bai, Daniel Rueckert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 275 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
275citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

275 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Point tracking as a temporal Cue for robust myocardial segmentation in echocardiography videos.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

215 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chen ChenBiomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Chen QinBiomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Huaqi QiuBiomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Giacomo TarroniBiomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jinming DuanSchool of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Wenjia BaiData Science Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Daniel RueckertBiomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning has become the most widely used approach for cardiac image segmentation in recent years. In this paper, we provide a review of over 100 cardiac image segmentation papers using deep learning, which covers common imaging modalities including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and ultrasound and major anatomical structures of interest (ventricles, atria, and vessels). In addition, a summary of publicly available cardiac image datasets and code repositories are included to provide a base for encouraging reproducible research. Finally, we discuss the challenges and limitations with current deep learning-based approaches (scarcity of labels, model generalizability across different domains, interpretability) and suggest potential directions for future research.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecardiac image analysiscardiac image segmentationCTdeep learningMRIneural networksultrasound

Identifiers

PMID32195270
PMCPMC7066212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.