Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32195081›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2020

4D Self-Morphing Culture Substrate for Modulating Cell Differentiation.

Shida Miao, Haitao Cui, Timothy Esworthy, Bhushan Mahadik, Se-Jun Lee, Xuan Zhou, Sung Yun Hann, John P Fisher, Lijie Grace Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Augmented 3D Printing for Multiscale Microphysiological Systems.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Long non-coding RNANeural regeneration research · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Highlights on Advancing Frontiers in Tissue Engineering.Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shida MiaoDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering The George Washington University 3590 Science and Engineering Hall, 800 22nd Street NW Washington DC 20052 USA.
Haitao CuiDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering The George Washington University 3590 Science and Engineering Hall, 800 22nd Street NW Washington DC 20052 USA.
Timothy EsworthyDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering The George Washington University 3590 Science and Engineering Hall, 800 22nd Street NW Washington DC 20052 USA.
Bhushan MahadikFischell Department of Bioengineering University of Maryland 3238 Jeong H. Kim Engineering Building College Park MD 20742 USA.
Se-Jun LeeDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering The George Washington University 3590 Science and Engineering Hall, 800 22nd Street NW Washington DC 20052 USA.
Xuan ZhouDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering The George Washington University 3590 Science and Engineering Hall, 800 22nd Street NW Washington DC 20052 USA.
Sung Yun HannDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering The George Washington University 3590 Science and Engineering Hall, 800 22nd Street NW Washington DC 20052 USA.
John P FisherFischell Department of Bioengineering University of Maryland 3238 Jeong H. Kim Engineering Building College Park MD 20742 USA.
Lijie Grace ZhangDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering The George Washington University 3590 Science and Engineering Hall, 800 22nd Street NW Washington DC 20052 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3009-045X
George Washington University · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the most versatile and promising cell source, stem cells have been studied in regenerative medicine for two decades. Currently available culturing techniques utilize a 2D or 3D microenvironment for supporting the growth and proliferation of stem cells. However, these culture systems fail to fully reflect the supportive biological environment in which stem cells reside in vivo, which contain dynamic biophysical growth cues. Herein, a 4D programmable culture substrate with a self-morphing capability is presented as a means to enhance dynamic cell growth and induce differentiation of stem cells. To function as a model system, a 4D neural culture substrate is fabricated using a combination of printing and imprinting techniques keyed to the different biological features of neural stem cells (NSCs) at different differentiation stages. Results show the 4D culture substrate demonstrates a time-dependent self-morphing process that plays an essential role in regulating NSC behaviors in a spatiotemporal manner and enhances neural differentiation of NSCs along with significant axonal alignment. This study of a customized, dynamic substrate revolutionizes current stem cell therapies, and can further have a far-reaching impact on improving tissue regeneration and mimicking specific disease progression, as well as other impacts on materials and life science research.

Indexed as

4D culture substratescell differentiationneural regenerationprogrammable culture substratesregenerative medicinestem cells

Identifiers

PMID32195081
PMCPMC7080541
OpenAlexW3007926138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.