ArticleJournal of Cancer2020
Development and validation of a 4-gene combination for the prognostication in lung adenocarcinoma patients.
Article in Journal of Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of a risk score model based on tyrosine-related genes in the prognosis and treatment of patients with lung adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- A Novel Stool Methylation Test for the Non-Invasive Screening of Gastric and Colorectal Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Recent Advances on the Role of ATGL in Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- m6A-Related Genes Contribute to Poor Prognosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Development and validation of a three-long noncoding RNA signature for predicting prognosis of patients with gastric cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2020Article
- To Develop and Validate the Combination of RNA Methylation Regulators for the Prognosis of Patients with Gastric Cancer.OncoTargets and therapy · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.