ArticleOncology letters2020
Identification of candidate RNA signatures in triple-negative breast cancer by the construction of a competing endogenous RNA network with integrative analyses of Gene Expression Omnibus and The Cancer Genome Atlas data.
Article in Oncology letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative proteomics analysis of triple-negative breast cancers.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- DARS-AS1: A Vital Oncogenic LncRNA Regulator with Potential for Cancer Prognosis and Therapy.International journal of medical sciences · 2024Review
- Combined mRNAs and clinical factors model on predicting prognosis in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.PloS one · 2021Article
- Modulatory Role of microRNAs in Triple Negative Breast Cancer with Basal-Like Phenotype.Cancers · 2020Review
- ceRNA network development and tumour-infiltrating immune cell analysis of metastatic breast cancer to bone.Journal of bone oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer that is characterized by aggressive and metastatic clinical characteristics and generally leads to earlier distant recurrence and poorer prognosis than other molecular subtypes. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) serve a crucial role in a wide variety of biological processes by interacting with microRNAs (miRNAs) as competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) and, thus, affect the expression of target genes in multiple types of cancer. Seven datasets from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, including 444 tumor and 88 healthy tissue samples, were utilized to investigate the underlying mechanisms of TNBC and identify prognostic biomarkers. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were further validated in The Cancer Genome Atlas database and the associations between their expression levels and clinical information were analyzed to identify prognostic values. A potential lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA ceRNA network was also constructed. Finally, 69 mRNAs from the integrated Gene Expression Omnibus datasets were identified as DEGs using the robust rank aggregation method with |log2FC|>1 and adjusted P<0.01 set as the significance cut-off levels. In addition, 29 lncRNAs, 21 miRNAs and 27 mRNAs were included in the construction of the ceRNA network. The present study elucidated the mechanisms underlying the progression of TNBC and identified novel prognostic biomarkers for TNBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.