Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32194678›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2020

Expression and clinical significance of MAPK and EGFR in triple-negative breast cancer.

Weihua Jiang, Xiaowen Wang, Chenguang Zhang, Laiti Xue, Liang Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. High uPAR and Low miR-221 Expression Predict Poor Disease-Free Survival in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Pectolinarigenin fromPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Weihua JiangDepartment of Breast Surgery, The 3rd Affiliated Teaching Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (Affiliated Cancer Hospital), Urumqi, Xinjiang 830011, P.R. China.
Xiaowen WangDepartment of Breast Surgery, The 3rd Affiliated Teaching Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (Affiliated Cancer Hospital), Urumqi, Xinjiang 830011, P.R. China.
Chenguang ZhangDepartment of Breast Surgery, The 3rd Affiliated Teaching Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (Affiliated Cancer Hospital), Urumqi, Xinjiang 830011, P.R. China.
Laiti XueDepartment of Breast Surgery, The 3rd Affiliated Teaching Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (Affiliated Cancer Hospital), Urumqi, Xinjiang 830011, P.R. China.
Liang YangDepartment of Breast Surgery, The 3rd Affiliated Teaching Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (Affiliated Cancer Hospital), Urumqi, Xinjiang 830011, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the expression and clinical significance of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a total of 300 TNBC and 120 paired paracancerous tissues were examined. Immunohistochemistry was conducted to determine the expression levels of MAPK and EGFR, and the correlation between MAPK and EGFR expression was evaluated using Cramer's V test. The association between MAPK and EGFR expression, and various clinicopathological variables (such as lymph node metastasis, clinical stage, recurrence and metastasis) was also evaluated, using the χ

Indexed as

clinical significanceEGFRMAPKTNBC

Identifiers

PMID32194678
PMCPMC7038935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.