ArticleOncology letters2020
Distinct expression and prognostic values of the replication protein A family in gastric cancer.
Article in Oncology letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeting phosphomevalonate kinase enhances radiosensitivity via ubiquitination of the replication protein A1 in lung cancer cells.Cancer science · 2023Article
- Actin nucleators safeguard replication forks by limiting nascent strand degradation.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Unravelling the clinicopathological and functional significance of replication protein A (RPA) heterotrimeric complex in breast cancers.NPJ breast cancer · 2023Article
- Actin nucleators safeguard replication forks by limiting nascent strand degradation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- DNA Damage Repair and Current Therapeutic Approaches in Gastric Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- Identification of Prognostic Model and Biomarkers for Cancer Stem Cell Characteristics in Glioblastoma by Network Analysis of Multi-Omics Data and Stemness Indices.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The replication protein A (RPA)1-4 family are single-stranded DNA-binding proteins that are essential components of DNA replication, repair and recombination, and cell cycle regulation. The present study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the RPA family members in patients with gastric cancer (GC), using datasets retrieved from the Oncomine public database. Datasets were retrieved for the purpose of comparing the RPA expression levels between GC and normal tissues. Additionally, Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the overall survival (OS) times of GC patients that expressed different levels of RPA proteins. RPA1, 2, and 3 expression levels were all significantly upregulated in gastric intestinal-type, diffuse gastric, and gastric mixed adenocarcinomas, compared with those in normal mucosal tissues. Moreover, high mRNA expression levels of RPA3 and 4 predicted poorer OS times in all GCs, as well as patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative and -positive GC. The high-risk group, separated by RPA signature, showed a poorer outcome than the low-risk group. RPA3 was the most strongly correlated with CD4+ T-cell levels. In conclusion, RPAs are novel prognostic indicators in GC, and can also predict the features of immunological diseases. Future experimental investigation into the roles of RPAs concerning the pathogenesis and development of GC may provide a novel biomarker or therapeutic target, improving the prognosis of patients with GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.