ArticleJournal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l'Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent2020
Examining the Impact of Motivation on Working Memory Training in Youth With ADHD.
Article in Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l'Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Working memory training in children with borderline intellectual functioning and neuropsychiatric disorders: a triple-blind randomised controlled trial.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR · 2022Trial
- Working memory and set-shifting in school-aged children classified as having attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWorking memory (WM) is often a deficit in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and is related to other impairments within this clinical population. Cogmed, a computerized WM training program, is sometimes prescribed as a treatment for ADHD youth - although the efficacy of this intervention remains controversial. Our main objective was to explore whether ADHD youths' motivational style predicted training engagement or performance on outcome measures. A second objective was to obtain a more nuanced understanding of potential benefits of the program via interviews.
methodThe current study focuses on 10 ADHD youth (age 8 - 14 years) randomized to a modified 30-session Cogmed protocol, as part of a larger clinical trial. Youth completed an adapted Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SRQ) and participated in a semi-structured interview at three-month follow-up.
resultsAll youth showed adherence to the modified Cogmed protocol. More externally motivated youth started training at a higher level of performance and also reached higher peak performance. At follow-up, higher levels of external forms of motivation correlated with better spatial working memory but worse academic performance. In addition, greater endorsement of external motivation was associated with lower self-concept. Qualitative analyses suggested that youth displayed multiple motivational styles with regard to participation and noted subjective improvements in their everyday lives.
conclusionsYouth endorsed both extrinsic and intrinsic motivation and reported that training was useful. Larger studies should consider assessing individual differences in motivational style and incorporating qualitative methodology to identify additional intervention outcome variables to consider amongst ADHD youth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32194647PMC7065563What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.