ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020
Communicative Methodology: Contributions to Social Impact Assessment in Psychological Research.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Framework development of the social impact of medical research utilization: Fuzzy Delphi approach.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Improving Social Interactions Among Adult Carers of Children with Disabilities Through Dialogic Literary Gatherings: A Case Study from Pakistan.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Role of the MeToo Route in Improving the Health of Gender-Based Violence and Isolating Gender Violence Survivors.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Evidence-Based Reconstruction of Memories of a Disdainful Hookup: Identifying Risk Factors and Preventing Further Victimization.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Men Tackling Isolating Gender Violence to Fight against Sexual Harassment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Participation and Organizational Commitment in the Mondragon Group.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Citizen Debates in Social Networks about Didactic Resources for Mathematics.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- The Consequences of Disdainful Hook-Ups for Later Egalitarian Relationships of Girls.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Health and Well-Being Consequences for Gender Violence Survivors from Isolating Gender Violence.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Qualitative Study on Dialogic Literary Gatherings as Co-creation Intervention and Its Impact on Psychological and Social Well-Being in Women During the COVID-19 Lockdown.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- I Do It, but I Decide With Whom.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- The Zero Violence Brave Club: A Successful Intervention to Prevent and Address Bullying in Schools.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Dialogic gathering of films. Promoting meaningful online interactions during COVID-19 confinement.PloS one · 2021Article
- Dialogic Learning Environments That Enhance Instrumental Learning and Inclusion of Students With Special Needs in Secondary Education.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- "Tell Someone," to Both Women and Men.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Stop Blaming me for What Others Did to you: New Alternative Masculinity's Communicative Acts Against Blaming Discourses.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Beyond the School Walls: Keeping Interactive Learning Environments Alive in Confinement for Students in Special Education.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advancements in the social impact assessment of science have shown the diverse methodologies being developed to monitor and evaluate the improvements for society as a result of research. These assessment methods include indicators to gather both quantitative and qualitative evidence of the social impact of science achieved in the short, medium, and long terms. In psychology, the impact of research has been mainly analyzed in relation to scientific publications in journals, but less is known about the methods for the social impact assessment of psychological research. Impact assessment in the domains of educational psychology and organizational psychology presents synergies with bottom-up approaches that include the voices of citizens and stakeholders in their analyses. Along these lines, the communicative methodology (CM) emerges as a methodology useful for the communicative evaluation of the social impact of research. Although the CM has widely demonstrated social impact in the social sciences, less is known about how it has been used and the impact achieved in psychological research. This article unpacks how to achieve social impact in psychology through the CM. In particular, it focuses on the theoretical underpinnings of the CM, the postulates linked to psychological research and some key actions for the implementation of the CM in relation to the design of Advisory Committees, working groups, and plenary meetings in research. Furthermore, it shows how the CM has been implemented in illustrative cases in psychological research. The article finishes with a conclusion and recommendations to further explore the ways in which the CM enables the social impact of research in psychology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.