Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32194335›Full record

ArticleSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society2020

Physicians' choices in the first- and second-line management of type 2 diabetes in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Khalid Al-Rubeaan, Faisal A Bana, Fayez G Alruwaily, Eman Sheshah, Dhekra Alnaqeb, Awad M AlQahtani, Diaa Ewais, Nassr Al Juhani, Abdul-Hameed Hassan, Amira M Youssef

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Prescribing patterns of antidiabetics in type 2 diabetes and factors affecting them.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Khalid Al-RubeaanUniversity Diabetes Center, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Faisal A BanaArmed Forces Hospital, Southern Region, Khamis Mushayt, Saudi Arabia.
Fayez G AlruwailyPrince Mutaib bin Abdul-Aziz Hospital, Al Jouf, Saudi Arabia.
Eman SheshahKing Salman bin Abdul-Aziz Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Dhekra AlnaqebKing Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Awad M AlQahtaniAseer Central Hospital, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Diaa EwaisSaudi German Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Nassr Al JuhaniAl-Thager Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Abdul-Hameed HassanInternational Medical Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Amira M YoussefStrategic Center for Diabetes Research, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Armed Forces Hospital · SAAsir Central Hospital · SAKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center · SAKing Fahad Hospital Jeddah · SAKing Khalid University Hospital · SAKing Saud University · SAPrince Mohammed bin Abdulaziz Hospital · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe DISCOVER study is a global, prospective, three- year- observational (non-interventional) study that was conducted in 37 countries throughout the world including Saudi Arabia and aimed to assess variations in treatment patterns and therapeutic outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients. The current manuscript is reporting data of DISCOVER study across different health sectors of various provinces in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

methodsIn this study, 519 Saudi type 2 diabetics, non-insulin users, aged 18 years or older, initiating second line therapy, were selected from nine health institutes, in four out of five provinces in Saudi Arabia. Data was collected at baseline (initiation of 2nd line therapy) by the treating physician using an electronic case report form (eCRF) via a web-based data capture system. Each selected subject was asked to complete four self-administered questionnaires.

resultsThe mean age of the studied population was 52.4 ± 11 years. Among the subjects selected from the nine medical centers, 55% were men, with almost 65% between the ages of 46 and 65 years. The oral agent used as 1st line in the majority of patients was metformin, prescribed in 89.2% of the study cohort. In the second line, sitagliptin was the most frequently used, at 61.8%. followed by gliclazide, glibenclamide, and glimepiride at 35.6%, 13.1%, and 12.7%, respectively.

conclusionMetformin, with or without sulfonylureas, is the most commonly prescribed first-line treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes, managed either in governmental institutions, or in the private sector. The most common second line drugs were DPP4 inhibitors, mainly sitagliptin, followed by the third and second generation of sulfonylureas. Drug affordability was not an issue, since the vast majority of the patients received medication free of charge.

Indexed as

Discover Type 2 diabetesFirst line managementSecond line management

Identifiers

PMID32194335
PMCPMC7078533
OpenAlexW3004076349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.