Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32194300›Full record

ArticleChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu2020

Incidence and mortality of laryngeal cancer in China, 2015.

Yutong He, Di Liang, Daojuan Li, Baoen Shan, Rongshou Zheng, Siwei Zhang, Wenqiang Wei, Jie He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The RNA mCell death & disease · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Investigation of imbalances in essential/toxic metal levels in the blood of laryngeal cancer patients in comparison with controls.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2023
    Article
  13. [Overview of thyroid gland involvement and its prognostic value on advanced laryngeal cancer].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yutong HeCancer Institute, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University/the Tumor Hospital of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050011, China.
Di LiangCancer Institute, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University/the Tumor Hospital of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050011, China.
Daojuan LiCancer Institute, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University/the Tumor Hospital of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050011, China.
Baoen ShanCancer Institute, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University/the Tumor Hospital of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050011, China.
Rongshou ZhengNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Siwei ZhangNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Wenqiang WeiNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Jie HeNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveUsing data from cancer registries to estimate laryngeal cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2015.

methodsData submitted from 501 cancer registries were checked and evaluated according to the criteria of data quality control and 368 registries' data were qualified for the final analysis. Data were stratified by area (urban/rural), sex, age group and combined with national population data to estimate laryngeal cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2015. China population census in 2000 and Segi's population were used for age-standardized.

resultsThe percentage of cases morphological verified (MV%) of laryngeal cancer was 74.18%. The percentage of death certificate-only cases (DCO%) was 2.10%. And the mortality to incidence (M/I) ratio was 0.55. About 25,300 new cases of laryngeal cancer were diagnosed in 2015 and 13,700 deaths were reported. The crude rate of laryngeal cancer was 1.84 per 100,000 (males and females were 3.20 and 0.42 per 100,000, respectively). Age-standardized incidence rates by Chinese standard population (ASIRC) and by world standard population (ASIRW) were 1.18 and 1.19 per 100,000, respectively. The cumulative incidence rate (0-74 years old) was 0.15%. The crude mortality rate was 1.00 per 100,000. Age-standardized mortality rates by Chinese standard population (ASMRC) and by world standard population (ASMRW) were 0.61 and 0.61 per 100,000, respectively, with the cumulative rate (0-74 years old) was 0.07%. Incidence and mortality of laryngeal cancer in males were higher than those in females. And the rates in urban areas were higher than those in rural areas.

conclusionsThe incidence and mortality of laryngeal cancer in China were low. And the rates were significantly higher in males than in females. Risk factor control and targeted prevention should be strengthened.

Indexed as

Chinaincidencelaryngeal cancermortality

Identifiers

PMID32194300
PMCPMC7072018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.