Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32194246›Full record

ArticleThe spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society2020

Underweight patients are at just as much risk as super morbidly obese patients when undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery.

Taylor D Ottesen, Rohil Malpani, Anoop R Galivanche, Cheryl K Zogg, Arya G Varthi, Jonathan N Grauer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Survival bias may explain the appearance of the obesity paradox in hip fracture patients.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Taylor D OttesenDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, 47 College Street, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
Rohil MalpaniDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, 47 College Street, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
Anoop R GalivancheDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, 47 College Street, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
Cheryl K ZoggDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, 47 College Street, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
Arya G VarthiDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, 47 College Street, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
Jonathan N GrauerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, 47 College Street, New Haven, CT 06511, USA. Electronic address: jonathan.grauer@yale.edu.
Yale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007205 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KAZMIERCZAK, BARBARA I · 1985 to 2019
$42.9M
NIA Short Term Research Training: Students in Health Professional SchoolsT35AG049685 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Sarwat I Chaudhry, Terri R. Fried · 2016 to 2026
$804k
The ED.TRAUMA Study: Evaluating the Discordance ofTrauma Readmission And Unanticipated Mortality in the Assessment of hospital qualityF30AG066371 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ZOGG, CHERYL K · 2019 to 2022
$163k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIA NIH HHS F30 AG066371NIA NIH HHS T35 AG049685NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background contextPast studies have focused on the association of high body mass index (BMI) on spine surgery outcomes. These investigations have reported mixed conclusions, possible due to insufficient power, poor controlling of confounding variables, and inconsistent definitions of BMI categories (e.g. underweight, overweight, and obese). Few studies have considered outcomes of patients with low BMI. PURPOSE: To analyze how anterior cervical spine surgery outcomes track with World Health Organization categories of BMI to better assess where along the BMI spectrum patients are at risk for adverse perioperative outcomes. DESIGN/

settingRetrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients undergoing elective anterior cervical spine surgery were abstracted from the 2005 to 2016 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. OUTCOME MEASURES: Thirty-day adverse events, hospital readmissions, postoperative infections, and mortality.

methodsPatients undergoing anterior cervical spine procedures (anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, anterior cervical corpectomy, cervical arthroplasty) were identified in the 2005 to 2016 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients were then aggregated into modified World Health Organization categories of BMI. Odds ratios of adverse outcomes, normalized to average risk of normal weight subjects (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m

resultsIn total, 51,149 anterior cervical surgery patients met inclusion criteria. Multivariate analyses revealed the odds of any adverse event to be significantly elevated for underweight and super morbidly obese patients (Odds Ratios [OR] of 1.62 and 1.55, respectively). Additionally, underweight patients had elevated odds of serious adverse events (OR=1.74) and postoperative infections (OR=1.75) and super morbidly obese patients had elevated odds of minor adverse events (OR=1.72). Relative to normal BMI patients, there was no significant elevation for any adverse outcomes for any of the other overweight/obese categories, in fact some had reduced odds of various adverse outcomes.

conclusionsUnderweight and super morbidly obese patients have the greatest odds of adverse outcomes after anterior cervical spine surgery. The current study identifies underweight patients as an at-risk population that has previously not received significant focus. Physicians and healthcare systems should give additional consideration to this population, as they often already do for those at the other end of the BMI spectrum.

Indexed as

Obesity, MorbidAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBody Mass IndexCervical VertebraeElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsThinnessAmerican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP)Anterior cervical spineBody mass index (BMI)MortalityPerioperative adverse eventsReadmissionRisk factorsUnderweight

Identifiers

PMID32194246
PMCPMC7380546
OpenAlexW3010997157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.