ArticleAcademic pediatrics
Comparing Three Measures of Self-Efficacy of Asthma Self-Management in Adolescents.
Article in Academic pediatrics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of self-efficacy and its limiting factors among children with asthma aged 8-18 years.BioPsychoSocial medicine · 2026Article
- Peak Flow Meter and Spacer Use in Adolescents with Asthma: More than Just Ownership.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- One-session asthma curriculum for all K-8th grade students: impact on knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Article
- Determinants of adherence to inhaler use in patients with asthma: the role of knowledge, self-efficacy, and perceived barriers.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the Adolescent Asthma Self-Efficacy Questionnaire.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Long-term effects of a peer-led asthma self-management program on asthma outcomes in adolescent peer leaders.Patient education and counseling · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study examines the relationships between 3 measures of asthma-related self-efficacy and compares them by their relationships to quality of life, medication adherence, asthma control, asthma knowledge, and attitudes in adolescents.
methodsParticipants included 371 urban adolescents (age 12-20 years) with asthma. Three self-efficacy measures included the Asthma Outcome Expectation-self-efficacy subscale (AOE-SE), Asthma Management Index-self-efficacy subscale (AMI-SE), and the Asthma Self-Efficacy scale (ASE).
resultsThe sample included 50% male, predominantly African American (78.4%) participants. All 3 measures of self-efficacy were positively correlated with each other (r = 0.46-0.54, P < .001). After controlling for gender, age, race, and health insurance type, all 3 self-efficacy measures predicted the symptom domain of quality of life, adherence, asthma control, and knowledge. Activity limitation was predicted by AMI-SE (B = 0.19, P = .008) and ASE (B = 0.38, P < .001) but not by AOE-SE, while emotional function associated only with ASE (B = 0.37, P < 0.001). Attitudes were positively associated with AOE-SE and ASE (B = 1.83 and 2.87, respectively, P < 0.001 for both), but not with AMI-SE.
conclusionsMedication adherence and symptom control in adolescents were predicted by self-efficacy measured by the 3 measures, while these measures differed in their performance in predicting psychosocial outcomes. ASE appears the measure of choice in measuring adolescents' self-efficacy given its association with all outcome measures of the study. Further research is needed to investigate the generalized use of the self-efficacy measures in populations with varying demographic or asthma characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.