Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32193871›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2020

Diagnosis of Cutaneous Melanoma: the Gap Between the Knowledge of General Practitioners and Dermatologists in a Brazilian Population.

Andrea Quadros Garrido, Alberto Julius Alves Wainstein, Marina Patrus Ananias Brandão, Fernando Augusto de Vasconcellos Santos, Flavia Vasques Bittencourt, Carolina Ledsham, Ana Paula Drummond-Lage

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Oncology Education in Undergraduate Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Expectations and Perceptions Between First- and Sixth-Year Cohorts.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea Quadros GarridoFaculdade Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais, School of Medicine, Alameda Ezequiel Dias 275, Belo Horizonte, 30130-110, Brazil.
Alberto Julius Alves WainsteinFaculdade Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais, School of Medicine, Alameda Ezequiel Dias 275, Belo Horizonte, 30130-110, Brazil.
Marina Patrus Ananias BrandãoFaculdade Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais, School of Medicine, Alameda Ezequiel Dias 275, Belo Horizonte, 30130-110, Brazil.
Fernando Augusto de Vasconcellos SantosFaculdade Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais, School of Medicine, Alameda Ezequiel Dias 275, Belo Horizonte, 30130-110, Brazil.
Flavia Vasques BittencourtUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Carolina LedshamFaculdade Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais, School of Medicine, Alameda Ezequiel Dias 275, Belo Horizonte, 30130-110, Brazil.
Ana Paula Drummond-LageFaculdade Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais, School of Medicine, Alameda Ezequiel Dias 275, Belo Horizonte, 30130-110, Brazil. anapdru@gmail.com.
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The early diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma provides less aggressive treatment reducing mortality. General practitioners are responsible for cancer diagnoses in the Brazilian Public Health System and therefore play a crucial role in the prevention and early detection of melanoma. To assess the melanoma knowledge of a primary healthcare physician, the general practitioner, compared to a dermatologist. General practitioners and dermatologists answered a questionnaire about melanoma and the management of suspected cases. The results of both groups were compared. The sample consisted of 80 specialists and 160 general practitioners. When asked about the "ABCDE" rule, 96.2% of the dermatologists knew about it, compared to 34.4% of the general practitioners. The percentage of dermatologists who examined the whole skin of the patient at high risk for melanoma was 90% vs. 24.5% amongst general practitioners. The most cited reasons for the absence of the examination of patients at risk for melanoma were lack of time at the consultations (17.6% specialists, 66.1% generalists) and an excessive number of patients (17.6% specialists, 61.5% generalists). General practitioner has less knowledge about melanoma compared to the dermatologists and presents deficient behaviors about patients at risk or who have suspicious lesions, indicating the need for training and continuing education.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesCutaneous Malignant MelanomaDermatologistsDiagnostic ErrorsFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansMaleMelanomaPractice Patterns, Physicians'Skin NeoplasmsSurveys and QuestionnairesCancerDermatologyGraduate medical educationPrimary carePublic healthScreeningSkin

Identifiers

PMID32193871
OpenAlexW4244634978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.