Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32193853›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2020

Validity and Performance of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) for Screening of Depression in a Rural Chilean Cohort.

Constanza Caneo, Pablo Toro, Catterina Ferreccio, Mauco Research Team

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Constanza CaneoDepartamento de Psiquiatría, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Diagonal Paraguay 362, Quinto Piso, Santiago Centro, Santiago, 8330049, Chile. cmcaneo@uc.cl.
Pablo ToroDepartamento de Psiquiatría, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Diagonal Paraguay 362, Quinto Piso, Santiago Centro, Santiago, 8330049, Chile.
Catterina FerreccioMAUCO Cohort/Advanced Center for Chronic Diseases, ACCDiS. Departamento de Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Diagonal Paraguay 362, Santiago, Chile.
Mauco Research Team
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLAdvanced Center for Chronic Diseases · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Validity of PHQ-2 to screen for depression was assessed in an agricultural population in Chile. The sample included 4767 adults enrolled from 2014 to 2017 in a population-based cohort of chronic disease in Maule, Chile. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to find the optimal PHQ-2 cut-off for depression, defined as the highest Youden index, using PHQ-9 as a reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, and Youden J index were calculated for every cut-off point of PHQ-2. Prevalence of depression measured by PHQ-9 and PHQ-2 was 18% and 18.4%, respectively. Corresponding rates for women were 24.7% and 23.6%, and 8.3% and 10.9 for men. The optimal PHQ-2 cut-off score was 3, achieved with a sensitivity of 74.6%, specificity 93.9%, and Youden index of 0.68. The area under the curve for the ROC analysis ROC curve was 0.92 (95% CI 0.91-0.93). PHQ-2 has good performance for use as a test for depression screening in a rural population of Chile and can be easily applied in areas with low resources.

Indexed as

DepressionPatient Health QuestionnaireAdultChileFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveRural PopulationSensitivity and SpecificitySurveys and QuestionnairesCross-sectionalDepressionMental health carePHQ-2PHQ-9Primary careRural populationScreeningValidation

Identifiers

PMID32193853
OpenAlexW3012288037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.