ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2020
Simple FISH-based evaluation of spermatic nuclear architecture shows an abnormal chromosomal organization in balanced chromosomal rearrangement carriers.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic/epigenetic effects in NF1 microdeletion syndrome: beyond the haploinsufficiency, looking at the contribution of not deleted genes.Human genetics · 2024Article
- Article
- Chromosomal segregation analysis and HOST-based sperm selection in a complex reciprocal translocation carrier.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023Article
- Detailed cell-level analysis of sperm nuclear quality among the different hypo-osmotic swelling test (HOST) classes.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021Article
- Molecular Profiling of Spermatozoa Reveals Correlations between Morphology and Gene Expression: A Novel Biomarker Panel for Male Infertility.BioMed research international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInterphasic DNA has a constant three-dimensional conformation, which is particularly striking for spermatic DNA, with distinct chromosomal territories and a constant chromosomal conformation. We hypothesized that this organization is fragile, and that an excess or a lack of chromosomal segments could hinder the genomic structure as a whole.
methodsFive human male chromosomal translocation carriers and five controls were included. Spermatic DNA spatial organization was studied, in both balanced and unbalanced spermatozoa, with two-dimensional fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) via analysis of chromosomes not implicated in the cases' translocations, compared to that of normal controls. Two parameters were studied: the distance between the two telomeric ends of chromosome 1, and the area of the chromosomal territories of chromosomes 1 and 17.
resultsSperm FISH analysis of rearrangement carriers revealed changes in the nuclear architecture compared to that of controls. Inter-telomeric distance and chromosomal territories areas were both significantly increased. DISCUSSION: We show that an excess or lack of chromosomal segments can hinder the normal spatial nuclear architecture in sperm. These results show that nuclear architecture is a fragile assembly, and that local chromosomal abnormalities may impact the nucleus as a whole. This suggests a potential avenue for selection of spermatozoa prior to in vitro fertilization, not only in rearrangement carriers but also in the infertile population at large. Furthermore, we suggest that 2D-FISH could possibly be a useful tool in assessing spermatic nuclear organization in a way to evaluate male fertility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.