ArticleWorld journal of urology2021
Classification of the renal papillary abnormalities by flexible ureteroscopy: evaluation of the 2016 version and update.
Article in World journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visual assessment of Randall's plaque using traxer grading and its correlations with demographic characteristics, metabolic parameters and stone analysis.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Validation of a Renal Papillary Grading System: Comparison of Patients Forming Calcium Oxalate and Apatite Stones.Journal of endourology · 2026Article
- Research on key pathogenesis and potential intervention targets of idiopathic renal calculi composed of calcium oxalate (CaOx) based on bioinformatics.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Article
- Correlation analysis between renal papillae Hounsfield density (PHD) and endoscopic papillary description in stone formers.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Renal papillary tip biopsy in stone formers: a review of clinical safety and insights.Urolithiasis · 2024Review
- Advancements in stone classification: unveiling the beauty of urolithiasis.World journal of urology · 2024Review
- Toward improved endoscopic examination of urinary stones: a concordance study between endoscopic digital pictures vs microscopy.BJU international · 2021Article
- Endoscopic Papillary Abnormalities and Stone Recognition (EPSR) during Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Editorial Comment: Classification of the renal papil-lary abnormalities by flexible ureteroscopy: evalua-tion of the 2016 version and update.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyArticle
- Editorial Comment: Classification of the renal papil-lary abnormalities by flexible ureteroscopy: evalua-tion of the 2016 version and update.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyArticle
- [Recommendations of the Urolithiasis Committee of the French Urology Association for the management and the treatment of the stone formers patients during the COVID-19 pandemic crisis].Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologieReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTo assess the use of the 2016 proposed classification of the renal papillary abnormalities during flexible ureteroscopy that aims to standardize their description. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe performed a prospective monocentric single operator collection of the data using this classification during 88 consecutive flexible ureteroscopies required for renal stones treatment. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: data of stones analysis (microscopy and infrared spectrophotometry) and of serum and urines biochemical samples have been compared with the results of the classified endoscopic descriptions.
resultsMean duration of description was 81.4 s. We reported that 83% of the patients had Randall plaques (RP), as only 4.5% of the patients had no abnormality. Concerning the papillary stones and anchored stones were observed in 30.7% and aspect of intraductal crystallization (Sc) in 15.9%. Erosions were present in 55.7% and extrophic papillae in 8%. Sa1 and Pa2 were significantly correlated to RP, anchored stones (Sa) to papillary erosions and calcium phosphate stones to intraductal crystallization. Hypercalciuria was significantly higher in Sa2 than Sa1 stones.
conclusionsThe different descriptions in the 2016 classification were confirmed by the results of this study. Papillary abnormalities are consequences of stones development. Their descriptions could also improve the follow-up and the diagnosis of a metabolic lithogenesis. We recommend their systematic description during ureteroscopy. Some improvements are proposed to update this classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.