Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32193641›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2020

Quantitative computed tomography assessment for systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease: comparison of different methods.

Furkan Ufuk, Mahmut Demirci, Goksel Altinisik

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Exploratory evaluation of earlyEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Quantitative Analysis for Lung Disease on Thin-Section CT.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Co-Occurrence of Anthracosis with Interstitial Lung Disease.Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases : official journal of WASOG · 2022
    Article
  14. Evaluation of disease severity with quantitative chest CT in COVID-19 patients.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2021
    Article
  15. Novel Imaging Strategies in Systemic Sclerosis.Current rheumatology reports · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Furkan UfukDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Pamukkale, Kinikli, 20100, Denizli, Turkey. furkan.ufuk@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8614-5387
Mahmut DemirciDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Pamukkale, Kinikli, 20100, Denizli, Turkey.
Goksel AltinisikDepartment of Chest Diseases, School of Medicine, University of Pamukkale, Kinikli, 20100, Denizli, Turkey.
Pamukkale University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the previously defined six different histogram-based quantitative lung assessment (QLA) methods on high-resolution CT (HRCT) in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc)-related interstitial lung disease (ILD).

methodsThe HRCT images of SSc patients with ILD were reviewed, and the visual ILD score (semiquantitative) and the severity of ILD (limited or extensive) were calculated. The QLA score of ILD was evaluated using the previously defined six different methods and parameters (different lung attenuation ranges, skewness, kurtosis, mean lung attenuation, and standard deviation [SD]). Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) were also performed on all patients. Relationships among variables were evaluated using Spearman's correlation coefficient (r). Diagnostic performance of quantitative methods for the ability to differentiate the limited from extensive ILD was calculated using ROC analysis.

resultsFifty-five patients were included in the study. There was a significant correlation between all quantitative and semiquantitative measurement results (p < 0.0001). The QLA scores revealed a significant correlation with PFT results. The kurtosis value of the voxels between - 200 and - 1024 Hounsfield unit (HU) (Method-5) showed the best correlation with semiquantitative evaluation (r = - 0.740, p < 0.0001). The ROC analysis demonstrated the best performance of SD of the voxels between - 400 and - 950 HU (Method-6) for histogram analysis method and Method-3 (voxels between - 260 and - 600 HU were calculated as ILD) for CT density cutoff methods.

conclusionsAll the QLA methods are applicable in assessing the ILD score in SSc patients and have potential importance to differentiate limited from extensive ILD. KEY POINTS: • Quantitative interstitial lung disease assessment helps clinicians to assess systemic sclerosis patients with interstitial lung disease. • Quantitative lung assessment methods are applicable in assessing the interstitial lung disease score in systemic sclerosis patients. • Quantitative lung assessment methods have potential importance in the management of patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHumansLungLung Diseases, InterstitialMaleMiddle AgedMultidetector Computed TomographyRespiratory Function TestsROC CurveScleroderma, SystemicSeverity of Illness IndexTomography, X-Ray ComputedInterstitial lung diseasesMultidetector computed tomographyPulmonary function testsQuantitative evaluationSystemic sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID32193641
OpenAlexW3012326980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.