Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32193603›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2020

Pleuropulmonary blastoma type I might arise in congenital pulmonary airway malformation type 4 by acquiring a Dicer 1 mutation.

Luka Brcic, Fabian Fakler, Sylvia Eidenhammer, Andrea Thueringer, Karl Kashofer, Janina Kulka, Helmut Popper

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Selection of potential targets for stratifying congenital pulmonary airway malformation patients with molecular imaging: is MUC1 the one?European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Congenital lung malformations.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Luka BrcicDiagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Neue Stiftingtalstrasse 6, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Fabian FaklerDiagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Neue Stiftingtalstrasse 6, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Sylvia EidenhammerDiagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Neue Stiftingtalstrasse 6, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Andrea ThueringerDiagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Neue Stiftingtalstrasse 6, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Karl KashoferDiagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Neue Stiftingtalstrasse 6, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Janina KulkaSecond Department of Pathology, Semmelweis University Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.
Helmut PopperDiagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Neue Stiftingtalstrasse 6, 8036, Graz, Austria. helmut.popper@medunigraz.at.
Medical University of Graz · ATSemmelweis University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Congenital pulmonary airway malformation (CPAM) occurs most commonly in infants. It is divided into 5 types. The most common types 1 and 2 are cystic, type 0 presents as bronchial buds without alveolar tissue, most likely corresponding to alveolar dysgenesis, while type 3 is composed of branching bronchioles and appears as a solid lesion. A defect in the epithelial-mesenchymal crosstalk might be the underlying mechanism for all. Type 4 is a peripheral cystic lesion with a thin cyst wall covered by pneumocytes. CPAM 4 has been mixed up with pleuropulmonary blastoma (PPB) type I and some authors question its existence. We investigated five cases of CPAM type 4 for the presence or absence of rhabdomyoblasts, and for markers associated with CPAM development. In addition, all cases were evaluated for mutations within the Dicer gene and for mutations of the RAS family of oncogenes. All five cases showed smooth muscle actin and desmin-positive cells; however, only one case showed a few cells positive for MyoD. The same case showed a mutation of Dicer 1. All cases were negative for mutations of the RAS family of genes. Fibroblast growth factor 10 was similarly expressed in all cases, and thus cannot be used to differentiate CPAM4 from PPB-I. Low expression of the proliferation marker Ki67 was seen in our CPAM 4 cases and the probable PPB-I case. YingYang-1 protein seems to play an active role in the development of PPB-I. CPAM 4 can be separated from PPB-I based on the presence of rhabdomyoblasts and mutations in Dicer 1 gene. These cells might not be numerous; therefore, all available tissue has to be evaluated. As CPAM 4 morphologically looks very similar to PPB-I, it might be speculated, that there exists a potential for progression from CPAM 4 to PPB-I, by acquiring somatic mutations in Dicer 1.

Indexed as

AdolescentBiomarkers, TumorCystic Adenomatoid Malformation of Lung, CongenitalDEAD-box RNA HelicasesDiagnosis, DifferentialDisease ProgressionFemaleGenes, rasHumansInfantLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMutationPulmonary BlastomaRibonuclease IIIBiomarkers, TumorDEAD-box RNA HelicasesDICER1 protein, humanRibonuclease IIICongenital pulmonary airway malformationCPAM 4Dicer 1 mutationPleuropulmonary blastomaRAS family oncogenes

Identifiers

PMID32193603
PMCPMC7443180
OpenAlexW3011281904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.