ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020
Bayesian inference of chromatin structure ensembles from population-averaged contact data.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Techniques to detect physical interactions between genomic regions.Epigenomics · 2025Review
- Advancements and future directions in single-cell Hi-C based 3D chromatin modeling.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- From Sequence to Solution: Intelligent Learning Engine Optimization in Drug Discovery and Protein Analysis.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2024Article
- Multiscale Bayesian simulations reveal functional chromatin condensation of gene loci.PNAS nexus · 2024Article
- Optimizing representations for integrative structural modeling using Bayesian model selection.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Optimizing representations for integrative structural modeling using Bayesian model selection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Large-scale data-driven and physics-based models offer insights into the relationships among the structures, dynamics, and functions of chromosomes.Journal of molecular cell biology · 2023Review
- Dynamics of chromosome organization in a minimal bacterial cell.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Article
- A Multigraph-Based Representation of Hi-C Data.Genes · 2022Article
- Chromatin as self-returning walks: From population to single cell and back.Biophysical reports · 2022Review
- Single-cell Hi-C data analysis: safety in numbers.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Perspectives for the reconstruction of 3D chromatin conformation using single cell Hi-C data.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Four-Dimensional Chromosome Structure Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Computational methods for the prediction of chromatin interaction and organization using sequence and epigenomic profiles.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mounting experimental evidence suggests a role for the spatial organization of chromatin in crucial processes of the cell nucleus such as transcription regulation. Chromosome conformation capture techniques allow us to characterize chromatin structure by mapping contacts between chromosomal loci on a genome-wide scale. The most widespread modality is to measure contact frequencies averaged over a population of cells. Single-cell variants exist, but suffer from low contact numbers and have not yet gained the same resolution as population methods. While intriguing biological insights have already been garnered from ensemble-averaged data, information about three-dimensional (3D) genome organization in the underlying individual cells remains largely obscured because the contact maps show only an average over a huge population of cells. Moreover, computational methods for structure modeling of chromatin have mostly focused on fitting a single consensus structure, thereby ignoring any cell-to-cell variability in the model itself. Here, we propose a fully Bayesian method to infer ensembles of chromatin structures and to determine the optimal number of states in a principled, objective way. We illustrate our approach on simulated data and compute multistate models of chromatin from chromosome conformation capture carbon copy (5C) data. Comparison with independent data suggests that the inferred ensembles represent the underlying sample population faithfully. Harnessing the rich information contained in multistate models, we investigate cell-to-cell variability of chromatin organization into topologically associating domains, thus highlighting the ability of our approach to deliver insights into chromatin organization of great biological relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.