ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020
Dissociable effects of visual crowding on the perception of color and motion.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatial anisotropy in crowding and ensemble perception.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- The development of visual acuity and crowding reveals the slow fine-tuning of foveal vision.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Target-flanker similarity alters the spatial profile of visual crowding.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Measuring spatial and temporal properties of visual crowding using continuous psychophysics.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Foveal crowding modifies a target's properties under a brief presentation time.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- When periphery rules: Enhanced sampling weights of the visual periphery in crowding across dimensions.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Article
- Reply to: Failure to replicate a superiority effect in crowding.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Color crowding considered as adaptive spatial integration.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Oculomotor Contributions to Foveal Crowding.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- The impact of training on the inner-outer asymmetry in crowding.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- Visual crowding: Double dissociation between orientation and brightness judgments.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- The role of spatial attention in crowding and feature binding.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- Crowding results from optimal integration of visual targets with contextual information.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Crowding changes appearance systematically in peripheral, amblyopic, and developing vision.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- Multidimensional feature interactions in visual crowding: When configural cues eliminate the polarity advantage.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- Masking, crowding, and grouping: Connecting low and mid-level vision.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- Emergence of crowding: The role of contrast and orientation salience.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Dissecting (un)crowding.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Mixture model investigation of the inner-outer asymmetry in visual crowding reveals a heavier weight towards the visual periphery.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Visual crowding effect in the parvocellular and magnocellular visual pathways.Journal of vision · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our ability to recognize objects in peripheral vision is fundamentally limited by crowding, the deleterious effect of clutter that disrupts the recognition of features ranging from orientation and color to motion and depth. Previous research is equivocal on whether this reflects a singular process that disrupts all features simultaneously or multiple processes that affect each independently. We examined crowding for motion and color, two features that allow a strong test of feature independence. "Cowhide" stimuli were presented 15° in peripheral vision, either in isolation or surrounded by flankers to give crowding. Observers reported either the target direction (clockwise/counterclockwise from upward) or its hue (blue/purple). We first established that both features show systematic crowded errors (biased predominantly toward the flanker identities) and selectivity for target-flanker similarity (with reduced crowding for dissimilar target/flanker elements). The multiplicity of crowding was then tested with observers identifying both features. Here, a singular object-selective mechanism predicts that when crowding is weak for one feature and strong for the other that crowding should be all-or-none for both. In contrast, when crowding was weak for color and strong for motion, errors were reduced for color but remained for motion, and vice versa with weak motion and strong color crowding. This double dissociation reveals that crowding disrupts certain combinations of visual features in a feature-specific manner, ruling out a singular object-selective mechanism. Thus, the ability to recognize one aspect of a cluttered scene, like color, offers no guarantees for the correct recognition of other aspects, like motion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.