Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32193259›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Knowing what the patient wants: a hospital ethnography studying physician culture in shared decision making in the Netherlands.

Laura Spinnewijn, Johanna Aarts, Sabine Verschuur, Didi Braat, Trudie Gerrits, Fedde Scheele

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laura SpinnewijnObstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands lauraspinnewijn@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8708-2744
Johanna AartsObstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sabine VerschuurFaculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Didi BraatObstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Trudie GerritsFaculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Fedde ScheeleDepartment of Research and Education, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLOLVG · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo study physician culture in relation to shared decision making (SDM) practice.

designExecution of a hospital ethnography, combined with interviews and a study of clinical guidelines. Ten-week observations by an insider (physician) and an outsider (student medical anthropology) observer. The use of French sociologist Bourdieu's 'Theory of Practice' and its description of habitus, field and capital, as a lens for analysing physician culture.

settingThe gynaecological oncology department of a university hospital in the Netherlands. Observations were executed at meetings, as well as individual patient contacts.

participantsSix gynaecological oncologists, three registrars and two specialised nurses. Nine of these professionals were also interviewed.

main outcome measuresCommon elements in physician habitus that influence the way SDM is being implemented.

resultsThree main elements of physician habitus were identified. First of all, the 'emphasis on medical evidence' in group meetings as well as in patient encounters. Second 'acting as a team', which confronts the patient with the recommendations of a whole team of professionals. And lastly 'knowing what the patient wants', which describes how doctors act on what they think is best for patients instead of checking what patients actually want. Results were viewed in the light of how physicians deal with uncertainty by turning to medical evidence, as well as how the educational system stresses evidence-based medicine. Observations also highlighted the positive attitude doctors actually have towards SDM.

conclusionsCertain features of physician culture hinder the correct implementation of SDM. Medical training and guidelines should put more emphasis on how to elicit patient perspective. Patient preferences should be addressed better in the patient workup, for example by giving them explicit attention first. This eventually could create a physician culture that is more helpful for SDM.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedPatient PreferencePhysiciansAnthropology, CulturalGynecologyHospital DepartmentsHospitals, UniversityHumansMedical OncologyNetherlandsPhysician-Patient Relationsbourdieuculturehabitushospital ethnographySDMshared decision making

Identifiers

PMID32193259
PMCPMC7150589
OpenAlexW3011380459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.