ReviewUrologic oncology2020
Nutrition risk and assessment process in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy.
Review in Urologic oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immune-Enhancing Nutrition and Outcomes After Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Sarcopenia Predicts Mortality in Bladder Cancer with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Multicenter Study.Cancers · 2026Article
- Sarcopenia and lower urinary tract diseases: links, mechanisms, and clinical implications.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- Article
- Sarcopenia in Urinary Bladder Cancer: Definition, Prevalence and Prognostic Value in Survival.Maedica · 2022Article
- Preoperative nutritional evaluation of prostate cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.PloS one · 2022Article
- Updates on enhanced recovery after surgery for radical cystectomy.Therapeutic advances in urologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Malnutrition and depleted muscle stores adversely affect bladder cancer patients and contribute to poorer outcomes. These nutrition-related problems are often not addressed, in part because they are not being identified with screening and assessment tools. In this essay, we discuss validated nutrition screening and assessment tools such as the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment; however, each healthcare team must decide on the one which will work best for their clinic. Patients with bladder cancer may be at risk for specific nutrient deficiencies which should be monitored and corrected to improve outcomes and overall health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.