Trial reportJournal of the American College of Cardiology2020
Systolic Blood Pressure in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Treated With Sacubitril/Valsartan.
Trial report in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01920711 (A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Valsartan, on Morbidity and Mortality in Heart Failure Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Valsartan, on Morbidity and Mortality in Heart Failure Patients (NYHA Class II-IV) With Preserved Ejection Fraction (PARAGON-HF)
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systolic blood pressure lower than 130 mmHg in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025Pooled it
- Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction management: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and recommendations.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2024Pooled it
- The WATCH-DM risk score estimates clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- Calcium Channel Blockade Versus β-Blockade for Hypertension in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Randomized Crossover Trial.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2026Trial
- Empagliflozin in resistant hypertension and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the EMPEROR-Preserved trial.European heart journal · 2025Trial
- Empagliflozin, irrespective of blood pressure, improves outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the EMPEROR-Preserved trial.European heart journal · 2023Trial
- Time in Target Range for Systolic Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Trial
- Sacubitril-valsartan as a treatment for apparent resistant hypertension in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.European heart journal · 2021Trial
- Finerenone and Blood Pressure in Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction: The FINEARTS-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA cardiology · 2026Article
- Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for the treatment of heart failure and kidney disease: a state-of-the-art review.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Intensive blood pressure control in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a symptom-modifying strategy.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Article
- Central Adiposity or Hypertension: Which Drives Heart Failure With a Preserved Ejection Fraction?Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2025Review
- Predicting cardiac and renal responses to sacubitril/valsartan with a mathematical model of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2025Article
- Identifying and characterizing commercially insured patients with HFpEF with high vs low health care resource utilization.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2025Article
- Pharmacologic Management of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) in Older Adults.Drugs & aging · 2025Review
- Pathophysiological insights into HFpEF from studies of human cardiac tissue.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2025Review
- Chinese Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Hypertension (2024 revision).Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2025Article
- Cardiorenal Syndrome in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights into Pathophysiology and Recent Advances.Cardiorenal medicine · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGuidelines recommend targeting systolic blood pressure (SBP) <130 mm Hg in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with limited data.
objectivesThis study sought to determine the optimal achieved SBP and whether the treatment effects of sacubitril/valsartan on outcomes are related to BP lowering, particularly among women who derive greater benefit from sacubitril/valsartan.
methodsUsing 4,795 trial participants, this study related baseline and time-updated mean achieved SBP quartiles (<120, 120 to 129, 130 to 139, ≥140 mm Hg) to the primary outcome (cardiovascular death and total heart failure hospitalization), its components, myocardial infarction or stroke, and a renal composite outcome. At the 16-week visit, the study assessed the relationship between SBP change and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score (KCCQ-OSS) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). The study analyzed whether the BP-lowering effects of sacubitril/valsartan accounted for its treatment effects.
resultsAverage age was 73 ± 8 years, and 52% of participants were women. After multivariable adjustment, baseline and mean achieved SBP of 120 to 129 mm Hg demonstrated the lowest risk for all outcomes. Sacubitril/valsartan reduced SBP by 5.2 mm Hg (95% confidence interval: 4.4 to 6.0) compared with valsartan at 4 weeks, which was not modified by baseline SBP. However, sacubitril/valsartan reduced SBP more in women (6.3 mm Hg) than men (4.0 mm Hg) (interaction p = 0.005). Change in SBP was directly associated with change in NT-proBNP (p < 0.001) but not KCCQ-OSS (p = 0.40). The association between sacubitril/valsartan and the primary outcome was not modified by baseline SBP (interaction p = 0.50) and was similar when adjusting for time-updated SBP, regardless of sex.
conclusionsBaseline and mean achieved SBP of 120 to 129 mm Hg identified the lowest risk patients with HFpEF. Baseline SBP did not modify the treatment effect of sacubitril/valsartan, and the BP-lowering effects of sacubitril/valsartan did not account for its effects on outcomes, regardless of sex. (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ARB Global Outcomes in HF With Preserved Ejection Fraction [PARAGON-HF]; NCT01920711).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.