Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32192473›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2020

Side effect concerns and their impact on women's uptake of modern family planning methods in rural Ghana: a mixed methods study.

Leah A Schrumpf, Maya J Stephens, Nathaniel E Nsarko, Eric Akosah, Joy Noel Baumgartner, Seth Ohemeng-Dapaah, Melissa H Watt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Leah A SchrumpfDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Box 90519, Durham, NC, 27708, USA. leahschrumpf01@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9797-4682
Maya J StephensDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Box 90519, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Nathaniel E NsarkoMillennium Promise Ghana, 14 Bathur St, East Legon, Accra, Ghana.
Eric AkosahMillennium Promise Ghana, 14 Bathur St, East Legon, Accra, Ghana.
Joy Noel BaumgartnerDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Box 90519, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Seth Ohemeng-DapaahMillennium Promise Ghana, 14 Bathur St, East Legon, Accra, Ghana.
Melissa H WattDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Box 90519, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.

Funding

Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University Student Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite availability of modern contraceptive methods and documented unmet need for family planning in Ghana, many women still report forgoing modern contraceptive use due to anticipated side effects. The goal of this study was to examine the use of modern family planning, in particular hormonal methods, in one district in rural Ghana, and to understand the role that side effects play in women's decisions to start or continue use.

methodsThis exploratory mixed-methods study included 281 surveys and 33 in-depth interviews of women 18-49 years old in the Amansie West District of Ghana between May and July 2018. The survey assessed contraceptive use and potential predictors of use. In-depth interviews examined the context around uptake and continuation of contraceptive use, with a particular focus on the role of perceived and experienced side effects.

resultsThe prevalence of unmet need for modern family planning among sexually active women who wanted to avoid pregnancy (n = 135) was 68.9%. No factors were found to be significantly different in comparing those with a met need and unmet for modern family planning. Qualitative interviews revealed significant concerns about side effects stemming from previous method experiences and/or rumors regarding short-term impacts and perceived long-term consequences of family planning use. Side effects mentioned include menstrual changes (heavier bleeding, amenorrhea or oligomenorrhea), infertility and childbirth complications.

conclusionAs programs have improved women's ability to access modern family planning, it is paramount to address patient-level barriers to uptake, in particular information about side effects and misconceptions about long-term use. Unintended pregnancies can be reduced through comprehensive counseling about contraceptive options including accurate information about side effects, and the development of new contraceptive technologies that meet women's needs in low-income countries.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildContraceptionContraception BehaviorContraceptive AgentsFamily Planning ServicesFearFemaleGhanaHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedPregnancyRural PopulationContraceptive AgentsBarriersContraceptivesFamily planningGhanaSide effects

Identifiers

PMID32192473
PMCPMC7082910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.